Directory of core insurance platform vendors using AI

The AI FinTech Index holds 2 of them, each graded on the same 15 capability axes from public sources, with the artifact every grade was read from attached to the record.

No vendor pays for inclusion, placement or rating. Counts generated 2026-08-24 across 490 indexed vendors. What moved is in the change log.

The AI here sits inside a policy administration estate the carrier already depends on, so the question is what the learned components decide rather than what the platform can do. Removability is the test: strip them out and ask whether the system still runs.

What is in this directory. Screened to policy administration and core systems. Point products that integrate into a core are held in the other directories.

Part of the wider Insurance AI category.

What the public record shows in this directory

The share of the 2 indexed vendors here whose public record answers each of the nine regulatory questions a financial institution diligence process works through, and where this directory ranks against the other 50 directories in the index on the same question, highest share first. A thin share means the public record is thin, not that a control is absent.

how the model works and how it is validated0%
0 of 2 vendors, 50 highest of 50 directories
regulatory status and licensure0%
0 of 2 vendors, 50 highest of 50 directories
data privacy posture under GLBA0%
0 of 2 vendors, 49 highest of 50 directories
security certification depth50%
1 of 2 vendors, 7 highest of 50 directories
AI governance and bias testing0%
0 of 2 vendors, 49 highest of 50 directories
how much the system decides on its own50%
1 of 2 vendors, 48 highest of 50 directories
liability and customer recourse0%
0 of 2 vendors, 48 highest of 50 directories
which models sit underneath50%
1 of 2 vendors, 9 highest of 50 directories
deployment model and data residency100%
2 of 2 vendors, 1 highest of 50 directories
In summary

The AI FinTech Index lists 2 core insurance platform vendors using AI, graded on 15 capability axes from public sources with no paid placement and no aggregate score. Across this directory the best documented part of the public record is deployment model and data residency at 100 percent, and the thinnest is liability and customer recourse at 0 percent, which is 48 highest of 50 directories in the index on that question. Across the whole index of 490 vendors, none documents all nine regulatory axes in public and the average documents 2.94.

Source: AI FinTech Index, August 2026

Vendors in this directory
2 indexed
Vendor Category AI Centrality Website
G
Guidewire
San Mateo headquartered, New York listed provider of the dominant core system suite for property and casualty insurance, serving more than 570 insurers across 43 countries. PolicyCenter, ClaimCenter and BillingCenter form the InsuranceSuite system of record, with InsuranceNow as a separate hosted product for smaller carriers, all delivered through Guidewire Cloud Platform running on Amazon Web Services. Around the core sits an analytics and data line: Explore for near real time business intelligence over suite data, Predict for machine learning models, Compare for claims benchmarking against peer and industry data, Canvas for visualisation during catastrophes, and Cyence for cyber risk analytics. The claims models analyse attributes at first notice of loss to identify potentially severe claims early, flag claims with a high likelihood of litigation, surface subrogation recovery opportunities and increase straight through processing on low severity claims. Its 2026 Qusar release introduced an Agentic Framework letting insurers build, deploy and manage insurance specific agents on the cloud platform, with company built agents for claims and underwriting alongside coding and product design assistants, and the company states that insurers can select different models for different business tasks. It has expanded pricing capability by acquisition, buying the Polish dynamic pricing vendor Quantee in April 2025, and is also an investor in and partner of Akur8. Named users include Zurich Insurance, which deployed ClaimCenter in Japan and the United Kingdom and selected Cyence for global cyber risk, plus Nationwide, Mountain West Farm Bureau, Basler and Yuzzu of the AXA group.
Insurance AI C guidewire.com
K
Korint
Paris based core insurance platform for insurers, managing general agents and brokers, covering the full property and casualty policy lifecycle from product configuration and rating through distribution, policy administration and claims. Sold either as a full core system or as modular components that connect to an existing back office without replacement. Ships roughly 50 AI agents covering core management actions, an AI Companion for user questions, and MCP servers that let a client connect its own internally developed agents to the platform. Named clients include WTW, Aon and Marsh alongside local MGAs, with 25 plus insurance products launched or migrated.
Insurance AI B korint.io

Common questions

Is there a directory of core insurance platform vendors using AI?

Yes. The AI FinTech Index lists 2 core insurance platform vendors using AI, each graded on the same 15 capability axes from public sources, with the artifact every grade was read from attached to the record. No vendor pays for inclusion, placement or rating, no vendor is contacted before it is listed, and nothing sits behind a form. Counts generated 2026-08-24.

What counts as insurance core platforms in this directory?

Screened to policy administration and core systems. Point products that integrate into a core are held in the other directories. The index holds 2 vendors meeting that screen, drawn from a wider Insurance AI category and from adjacent categories where the vendor belongs on the same shortlist. A vendor filed under a different category can still appear here, because a buyer building this shortlist does not sort by our filing.

What should a buyer check before shortlisting insurance core platforms vendors?

Start with what this segment does not publish. Across the 2 indexed vendors, the thinnest parts of the public record are liability and customer recourse at 0 percent, AI governance and bias testing at 0 percent, and data privacy posture under GLBA at 0 percent. A thin public record predicts the length of a diligence process rather than the absence of a control, so these are the questions to put in writing early. The AI here sits inside a policy administration estate the carrier already depends on, so the question is what the learned components decide rather than what the platform can do. Removability is the test: strip them out and ask whether the system still runs.

Other directories in Insurance AI

One category is several buying decisions sharing a label. Each of these narrows the same market to a different one.

Contact us

Found a vendor we missed? Have feedback on the index? We’d love to hear from you.

AI FinTech Index

The AI FinTech Index is an independent index that tracks changes to AI vendors in financial services. It holds 489 vendors across banking, lending, insurance, wealth, capital markets and financial crime compliance, each graded on the same 15 capability axes from public sources. No vendor pays for inclusion, placement, or rating.

Index Status
Last index update
September 5, 2026
The AI FinTech Index is an editorial reference, not a regulatory body. Vendor data is verified against published sources and public regulatory filings. Figures labeled “Estimated” have not been confirmed by the vendor. See the Methodology page for evaluation standards and limitations.
© 2026 AI FinTech Index
3801 N Capital of Texas Hwy, Ste E240 · Austin, TX 78746