AML, KYC & Financial Crime
I

iDenfy

iDenfy is a Lithuanian regulatory technology company providing identity verification, business verification, anti money laundering screening and monitoring, transaction monitoring and fraud prevention through a single platform and interface, sold to electronic money institutions, banks, fintechs, crypto platforms, gaming operators and marketplaces. Founded in 2017 and based in Kaunas, it reports more than 1,000 business customers, coverage of over 200 countries and territories and support for more than 16,000 government issued documents.

Three dimensional liveness detection and passive biometric verification are paired with an optional 24/7 in house review team that double checks flagged verifications within three minutes. Named customers include Mano Bank, Payset, GOAT Finance, HollaEx, Cherry Servers and Beera Station. Rates are published per verification, from $1.35 with a $135 monthly minimum down to 50 cents on volume Enterprise contracts, with an option to pay only for approved verifications. iDenfy publishes its ISO/IEC 27001 certificate number and issuer, names a SOC 2 Type II report from House of CPA, holds an eIDAS conformity declaration from the Electrotechnical Testing Institute in Prague, keeps all data in the European Union on Amazon Web Services in Dublin, and names its processors in its privacy policy.

Last VerifiedOctober 2, 2026
Compare iDenfy with other vendors
Founded
2017
Headquarters
Kaunas, Lithuania
Website
www.idenfy.com
Categories
aml-kyc-financial-crime, fraud-and-transaction-risk, compliance-and-surveillance
Assessment

Capability Axes

Capability grades

15 of 15 axes rated · 12 graded A or B

AI Capability
AI Centrality
BB on AI CentralityThe models are the engine of a core capability, layered on a product that would still function without them as a rules or workflow system.
Vendor Published

Liveness detection, document authentication and risk scoring all run on models, which carry the throughput. Without them a staffed manual verification service would remain, real but unable to scale.

Autonomy and Oversight Model
AA on Autonomy and Oversight ModelWhat the system runs alone, what constrains it, and how a person checks it are all published: modes, thresholds, sampling or audit controls, and the route a case takes to human review.
Vendor Published

In house specialists double check flagged verifications around the clock within three minutes, separating genuine submissions spoiled by lighting or framing from real fraud before a final decision. Sold as a 45 cent add on per verification, that layer sits in the decision path only for clients who buy it.

Model Risk Management and Transparency
BB on Model Risk Management and TransparencyReal transparency mechanisms are published, such as per alert explainability, confidence scoring or split testing, without the validation package or supervisory mapping behind them.
Vendor Published

External testing covers liveness against ISO 30107 part 3, and specialists flag when approval rates drift below a client's industry benchmark, a live signal across the output stream. Model documentation, error rates in either direction and a validation summary are not published.

Operational and Outcome Evidence
BB on Operational and Outcome EvidenceVendor aggregate claims with real figures, or audited scale disclosures from a publicly listed company.
Vendor Published

Named customer quotes carry the evidence, from the chief executives of Payset and Mano Bank to Cherry Servers, which credits the service with less fraud and better conversion. More than 1,000 businesses served and savings of up to 70 to 75 percent are aggregates tied to no customer, and the savings measure billing rather than accuracy.

AI Safety and Data Stewardship
CC on AI Safety and Data StewardshipGeneral assurances that do not answer the question this axis asks, which is whether one customer’s data trains models serving its competitors. Unbounded cross client learning stated with no boundary grades here too.
Vendor Published

Whether verification images, documents or biometric templates train the models is never addressed in the privacy policy. It is equally silent on whether one client's data shapes models that serve another, and on whether a client can opt out.

Regulatory and Compliance
GLBA and Data Privacy Posture
AA on GLBA and Data Privacy PostureThe privacy architecture is published in the specifics: data handling, retention, and a subprocessor list, which is rare in this index and valuable.
Vendor Published

Privacy terms reach the service itself: the June 3, 2026 policy states the processor role, describes the face images and templates handled for liveness and matching, and names each processor with its function and location. Retention follows the plan, 30 days on the free tier and client chosen periods from 1 day to 10 years on paid tiers, after which data is routinely deleted.

Security Certifications and Trust Center
AA on Security Certifications and Trust CenterCertifications named with their type and presented as retrievable artifacts, usually through a trust portal a buyer can open without asking.
Vendor Published

ISO 27001:2022 certificate ISMS 1851/A, issued by CERT International under SNAS accreditation, covers the verification, fraud prevention and anti money laundering software, has been held since 2020 and runs to June 2, 2029, with no nonconformities at the latest audit. House of CPA issued the SOC 2 Type II report, covering security, availability and confidentiality over 12 months in 2025 and 2026, which buyers can request.

Regulatory Status and Licensure
BB on Regulatory Status and LicensureThe regulatory position is clearly stated and appropriate to the product, with part of the verification left to the buyer.
Vendor Published

Regulatory footing comes from eIDAS declaration eIDAS250020, issued by the Electrotechnical Testing Institute in Prague, assessed against ETSI TS 119 461 and valid until September 26, 2027, for remote authentication by image identification. That is a conformity assessment rather than supervision, a fitting position for a technology supplier holding no financial license.

AI Governance and Bias Disclosure
DD on AI Governance and Bias DisclosureNothing published on a product where the bias risk is concrete, such as credit decisioning or underwriting with no fair lending, disparate impact or adverse action disclosure.
Vendor Published

Face matching and liveness carry a concrete demographic risk, yet approval or rejection rates by group, a bias testing method and variation across regions are all unpublished. Manual review is framed as handling poor captures rather than as a bias control, even though capture quality is a documented source of disparity in facial verification.

AI Liability and Recourse
CC on AI Liability and RecourseMechanisms that enable challenge, such as audit trails and source traceability, with nothing standing behind the output and no route for the person affected.
Vendor Published

Access, rectification and erasure rights give a person a route over the data held, and a 99.9 percent Enterprise service level and errors and omissions cover through Lloyd's of London point the same way for the client. Behind a wrong verification outcome itself stands no accuracy commitment, remedy or split of responsibility with the institution.

Integration and Deployment
Model Supply Chain Disclosure
BB on Model Supply Chain DisclosureSubstantial partial disclosure, or a chain that is structurally short: an explicit in house build, on premise deployment, per customer instances, or zero retention at the model layer.
Vendor Published

Google Ireland for biometric processing, Vonage for phone checks and Creditsafe for company data are among the processors the privacy policy names, and the liveness detection is described as patented. Which models the biometric processing uses, which parts are built in house and any model or version identifier are not given.

Core Systems and Integration Depth
BB on Core Systems and Integration DepthNamed systems or a documented public API, with the depth or the production evidence left open.
Vendor Published

An API and embedded frame sit beside mobile kits for Flutter and React Native and plugins for WordPress, Shopify and Magento, all with public developer documentation. Those connections lean toward general business software, and a core banking, account opening or loan origination system is not among them.

Deployment Model and Data Residency
BB on Deployment Model and Data ResidencyStated residency commitments or regional hosting options.
Vendor Published

All data resides in the European Union, with hosting on Amazon Web Services in Dublin and transfers outside the Union only under standard contractual clauses or similar safeguards. An on premises or hybrid option and residency outside Europe are not described.

Commercial
Commercial Transparency
AA on Commercial TransparencyPublished per unit rates a buyer can price against before any conversation.
Vendor Published

Per verification rates are public: pay as you go plans charge $1.35 with a $135 monthly minimum, and a yearly Enterprise contract falls as low as 50 cents depending on volume. Approved only charging at 50 cents keeps failed, abandoned and fraudulent attempts off the bill, and a 14 day trial with 10 free verifications lets a buyer test before committing.

Institution and Segment Coverage
BB on Institution and Segment CoverageNamed segments with dedicated material behind part of the coverage.
Vendor Published

Coverage reaches more than 200 countries and territories and over 16,000 government issued documents, with named users across banking, payments and crypto. The named financial clients are a small national bank and smaller regulated firms rather than a spread across tiers.

Tracked Since Listing

Product updates

Material product, regulatory, evidence and commercial changes at iDenfy, each verified against a live source and tagged to the capability axis it bears on. Funding rounds and awards are not product changes and are not logged.

Oct 12, 2026Product / capability

iDenfy's Sprint 137 lets bank card verification run as a step of identity verification inside apps built with its iOS and Android SDKs. Capture runs in an iDenfy hosted secure view inside the SDK that sends card images straight to iDenfy's PCI DSS certified card environment, so they never pass through the client app's code. The same release adds the Brazil CPF check to the native SDKs.

Bears on: GLBA and Data Privacy PostureSource
Our read on this update →Tracked since Oct 2026
Head to Head

Compared With

Most editorial comparisons pair two vendors the index assesses as direct competitors for the same buyer. Some pair vendors that are adjacent rather than rival, where the useful question is where one ends and the other begins. Each carries a verdict, the buyer conditions that favor each vendor, and a graded side by side.

Alternatives to iDenfy

Vendors in the same categories as iDenfy whose profiles look most alike, each with a line on what the product does. Similar is not the same: check that each one does the job you need. No vendor pays for placement.

Fourthline handles customer due diligence and anti money laundering compliance for European banks, fintechs, insurers and brokers, combining proprietary models for document authenticity…

Sumsub is a London based full cycle verification and financial crime compliance platform covering customer and business onboarding, sanctions and politically exposed person screening…

Identomat is a Georgian American identity verification and compliance platform sold to banks, insurers, electronic money institutions, payment providers, telecom operators, gaming operators…

IDnow sells identity verification, fraud prevention and electronic signatures to banks, lenders, insurers, crypto firms, telecoms and gaming operators from its base in Munich, with offices…

Shufti sells identity verification, business verification, anti money laundering screening and fraud prevention through one application programming interface to banks, fintechs, crypto…

Socure operates an AI native identity verification and risk decisioning platform used by financial institutions for customer identification, know your customer checks, sanctions and…

The index publishes no overall score or ranking. See what we assess and the methodology.

Commercial

Pricing

Vendor-published figures are labeled as such. Figures labeled “Estimated” are derived from third-party sources and have not been confirmed by the vendor.

Entry Price Pricing Basis Data Protection Terms Implementation Source
$1.35 per verification (Basic or Premium), with a $135 monthly minimum. Enterprise from as low as 50 cents per verification depending on volume.
Per verification on pay as you go monthly plans, Basic and Premium, both at $1.35 with a $135 monthly minimum, Premium adding discounts on extras; or a yearly Enterprise contract on volume based pricing that falls to as low as 50 cents per verification and includes a dedicated account manager, business verification, AML monitoring, up to $1 million of cyber insurance, a 99.9 percent service level and 8 year data retention. Add ons are priced per verification: approved only charging 50 cents, sanctions and politically exposed person checks 45 cents, proof of address 90 cents, duplicate detection 10 cents, 24/7 manual review 45 cents, United States criminal background and driver record checks $1.90 each, and 3D liveness 20 cents. Customers can change plans from a subscription page without a sales conversation. Not tiered on the pricing page. No setup fee is published. A 14 day free trial includes 10 free verifications on the pay as you go plans. Vendor Published

Figures from the vendor's own pricing page as of 2 October 2026. The volume at which the Enterprise floor of 50 cents applies is not stated.

Contact us

Found a vendor we missed? Have feedback on the index? We’d love to hear from you.

AI FinTech Index

The AI FinTech Index is an independent index that tracks changes to AI vendors in financial services. It holds 610 vendors across banking, lending, insurance, wealth, capital markets and financial crime compliance, each graded on the same 15 capability axes from public sources. No vendor pays for inclusion, placement, or rating.

Index Status
Last index update
October 20, 2026
The AI FinTech Index is an editorial reference, not a regulatory body. Vendor data is verified against published sources and public regulatory filings. Figures labeled “Estimated” have not been confirmed by the vendor. See the Methodology page for evaluation standards and limitations.
© 2026 AI FinTech Index
3801 N Capital of Texas Hwy, Ste E240 · Austin, TX 78746