Compliance, Surveillance & RegTech
S

Solidus Labs

Solidus Labs provides trade surveillance, transaction monitoring and compliance workflows for crypto and traditional markets through its HALO platform, which combines surveillance, transaction monitoring, stablecoin and token monitoring, execution quality analysis, case management and AI agents. Detection analyzes trading behavior in full market context, correlating order flow with onchain and offchain signals, funding flows and social sentiment from sources such as Reddit and X, to find spoofing, layering, wash trading, front running, insider trading, pump and dump schemes and cross venue manipulation, and investigators can reconstruct the trading activity and market state behind an alert.

AI agents route alerts to analysts, draft case summaries and filings and handle routine low risk cases under human oversight. Customers named on its site include Charles Schwab, Kalshi, Paxos, eToro, Webull, Crypto.com, Anchorage and Zodia, and the company states it monitors $16 trillion in daily volume.

Last VerifiedOctober 2, 2026
Compare Solidus Labs with other vendors
Founded
2017
Headquarters
New York, New York, United States
Categories
compliance-and-surveillance, crypto-and-digital-assets, aml-kyc-financial-crime
Assessment

Capability Axes

Capability grades

15 of 15 axes rated · 9 graded A or B

AI Capability
AI Centrality
BB on AI CentralityThe models are the engine of a core capability, layered on a product that would still function without them as a rules or workflow system.
Vendor Published

Behavioral analytics over full market context, a machine learning sentiment engine and agents that triage and document cases run across the HALO platform. The detection core is a configurable analytics engine, and order book reconstruction, case management and execution quality analysis would function without models.

Autonomy and Oversight Model
BB on Autonomy and Oversight ModelA written commitment that the models work alongside human judgment, with real review surfaces, short of the full control structure: commonly the threshold at which the system stops or what happens after it is wrong.
Vendor Published

Routing cases to analysts falls to a Compliance Operations Agent, a Remediation Agent handles routine low risk cases with human oversight, and Solomon, its AI analyst, can run case management end to end. Which cases an agent may close alone, at what threshold, and how closures are sampled go unpublished.

Model Risk Management and Transparency
BB on Model Risk Management and TransparencyReal transparency mechanisms are published, such as per alert explainability, confidence scoring or split testing, without the validation package or supervisory mapping behind them.
Vendor Published

Investigators can reconstruct trading activity and market state behind an alert, with annotated visualizations, full audit trails and more than 400 model customizations through a zero code interface. Detection accuracy, false positive rates and validation results are unpublished.

Operational and Outcome Evidence
BB on Operational and Outcome EvidenceVendor aggregate claims with real figures, or audited scale disclosures from a publicly listed company.
Vendor Published

Charles Schwab, Kalshi and Paxos are among named customers, with testimonials from Zodia Custody and One Trading. Its figures, $16 trillion of daily volume monitored and investigations 20 times faster, are aggregates with no customer attached.

AI Safety and Data Stewardship
CC on AI Safety and Data StewardshipGeneral assurances that do not answer the question this axis asks, which is whether one customer’s data trains models serving its competitors. Unbounded cross client learning stated with no boundary grades here too.
Vendor Published

Cross venue manipulation detection depends on seeing more than one venue's flow, and customers include competing exchanges and prediction markets. Whether models tuned on one venue's order flow inform surveillance at a competitor, or how customer data is segregated, is not stated.

Regulatory and Compliance
GLBA and Data Privacy Posture
BB on GLBA and Data Privacy PostureA substantive privacy document that reaches the product itself, short of the subprocessor list or the full data handling detail.
Vendor Published

A data processing addendum, privacy policy and subprocessor list sit on the legal page, so contractual terms for customer data are readable before engagement. Trader identities linked to order history, wallet activity and KYC records are what those terms must govern.

Security Certifications and Trust Center
CC on Security Certifications and Trust CenterA single footer line, or certifications asserted without being enumerated, which is weaker than naming them because it invites an assumption a buyer cannot check.
Vendor Published

Homepage and product pages name no certification, attestation or trust center. A platform ingesting complete order flow for brokerages would be expected to publish a SOC 2 report or ISO 27001 certificate.

Regulatory Status and Licensure
BB on Regulatory Status and LicensureThe regulatory position is clearly stated and appropriate to the product, with part of the verification left to the buyer.
Vendor Published

Trade surveillance maps to MiCA, the Market Abuse Regulation and MiFID II in Europe, to rules from the SEC, the CFTC and FINRA in the United States, and to Asian supervisors' expectations. No register entry or filing path stands behind the position.

AI Governance and Bias Disclosure
CC on AI Governance and Bias DisclosureResponsible artificial intelligence committed to in policy language with no evaluation behind it, on a product whose bias surface is modest.
Vendor Published

Detection infers intent from conduct, so a false positive means a trader investigated or restricted for lawful activity, and tuning to sophisticated patterns may misread smaller traders' unusual strategies. Alert accuracy by participant type is not published, despite claims of transparent logic.

AI Liability and Recourse
CC on AI Liability and RecourseMechanisms that enable challenge, such as audit trails and source traceability, with nothing standing behind the output and no route for the person affected.
Vendor Published

Traders flagged as manipulative may face restriction or a regulatory report without a described way to learn the basis or contest the finding. Case records and reconstruction let the venue defend a finding, but Solidus publishes no guarantee or indemnity.

Integration and Deployment
Model Supply Chain Disclosure
CC on Model Supply Chain DisclosureThe architecture is described and no provider is named.
Vendor Published

Reddit, X and news feed the sentiment engine, and order book, onchain and KYC data are described by category. Market data feeds, chain analytics providers and any model provider behind the agents are not named on product pages.

Core Systems and Integration Depth
BB on Core Systems and Integration DepthNamed systems or a documented public API, with the depth or the production evidence left open.
Vendor Published

Data from centralized and decentralized exchanges, OTC desks and traditional venues is normalized into one schema, alongside a separate API documentation site and a GTN partnership. Exchange, custody and case management integrations are not documented by name.

Deployment Model and Data Residency
BB on Deployment Model and Data ResidencyStated residency commitments or regional hosting options.
Vendor Published

Separate login endpoints for Asia, the United States and Europe indicate regional environments. Hosting provider, what stays in each region and any private option are not described.

Commercial
Commercial Transparency
CC on Commercial TransparencyNo price is published and engagement runs through a demo form, which is the norm in this index.
Vendor Published

Surveillance, token monitoring and execution quality all route to a demo request, with no price, plan or basis of charge published. For venues from a single stablecoin issuer to a global exchange, whether charges follow volume, venues or alert throughput decides affordability.

Institution and Segment Coverage
BB on Institution and Segment CoverageNamed segments with dedicated material behind part of the coverage.
Vendor Published

Exchanges, brokerages and prediction markets, alongside custodians and stablecoin issuers, rarely share a compliance vendor, yet all appear here across digital assets, derivatives and equities. Material is organized by product rather than institution type.

Tracked Since Listing

Product updates

Material product, regulatory, evidence and commercial changes at Solidus Labs, each verified against a live source and tagged to the capability axis it bears on. Funding rounds and awards are not product changes and are not logged.

Sep 23, 2026Integration / interoperabilityPartially verified

Solidus Labs says HALO is now running on GTN's global order book, providing trade surveillance and transaction monitoring across equities, fixed income, derivatives, FX and digital assets. It also says GTN's 500+ institutional clients can get their own dedicated HALO tenants through GTN's brokerage infrastructure, so they do not have to buy and integrate a separate surveillance system.

Bears on: Deployment Model and Data ResidencySource
Our read on this update →Tracked since Sep 2026

Alternatives to Solidus Labs

Vendors in the same categories as Solidus Labs whose profiles look most alike, each with a line on what the product does. Similar is not the same: check that each one does the job you need. No vendor pays for placement.

FluxForce sells AI agents to banks, fintechs, insurers and trade finance firms for fraud detection, identity verification, regulatory compliance, zero trust security and payment security…

Smarbl sells regulatory reporting and regulatory intelligence platforms to banks and other financial institutions, with two named products at different places on the automation spectrum.

Fiddler AI is a Palo Alto based AI observability and agent control plane vendor that sells a separately addressed financial services line rather than a financial services page.

Monitaur is a Boston based AI governance software company selling to highly regulated enterprises, with its deepest expertise in insurance and a growing financial services segment.

Exiger assesses risk in the third parties, suppliers and customers an organization depends on.

Intelligo sells AI due diligence and background checks to asset allocators, private equity, real estate, lending and banking clients.

The index publishes no overall score or ranking. See what we assess and the methodology.

Commercial

Pricing

Vendor-published figures are labeled as such. Figures labeled “Estimated” are derived from third-party sources and have not been confirmed by the vendor.

No pricing data has been verified for this vendor. Pricing information will be published here once confirmed through vendor disclosure or third-party estimation.

Contact us

Found a vendor we missed? Have feedback on the index? We’d love to hear from you.

AI FinTech Index

The AI FinTech Index is an independent index that tracks changes to AI vendors in financial services. It holds 610 vendors across banking, lending, insurance, wealth, capital markets and financial crime compliance, each graded on the same 15 capability axes from public sources. No vendor pays for inclusion, placement, or rating.

Index Status
Last index update
October 20, 2026
The AI FinTech Index is an editorial reference, not a regulatory body. Vendor data is verified against published sources and public regulatory filings. Figures labeled “Estimated” have not been confirmed by the vendor. See the Methodology page for evaluation standards and limitations.
© 2026 AI FinTech Index
3801 N Capital of Texas Hwy, Ste E240 · Austin, TX 78746