AI FinTech Index
Capital Markets & Research AI
P

Pactio

Pactio sells cloud software that private equity investors and their advisers use to close deals. It keeps sources and uses, capitalization tables, expenses and wiring schedules in sync, generates structure charts and flags errors as the team works, replacing the spreadsheets and email chains a closing usually runs on.

Every change is recorded in an audit trail, and a time machine feature restores earlier versions of the data. Pactio describes institutional grade security, controlled access and encryption.

Pactio raised a $14 million Series A led by EQT Ventures in April 2024, when it said the platform builds AI into deal creation and closing workflows. Its current homepage describes automation and error detection without describing AI.

Last VerifiedOctober 3, 2026
Compare Pactio with other vendors
Founded
2021
Headquarters
London, England, United Kingdom
Website
www.pactio.io
Categories
capital-markets-ai, compliance-and-surveillance, wealth-and-advisory
Assessment

Capability Axes

Capability grades

15 of 15 axes rated · 2 graded A or B

AI Capability
AI Centrality
CC on AI CentralityArtificial intelligence is present but peripheral: a feature layer on a product whose value stands without it.
Vendor Published

Automation is what the homepage describes, syncing cap tables, expenses and wiring schedules and flagging errors, with no AI mentioned anywhere on it. The AI claim lives only in a 2024 funding release.

Autonomy and Oversight Model
BB on Autonomy and Oversight ModelA written commitment that the models work alongside human judgment, with real review surfaces, short of the full control structure: commonly the threshold at which the system stops or what happens after it is wrong.
Vendor Published

Errors go to the deal team as flags. Who signs off a wiring schedule before money moves isn't described.

Model Risk Management and Transparency
BB on Model Risk Management and TransparencyReal transparency mechanisms are published, such as per alert explainability, confidence scoring or split testing, without the validation package or supervisory mapping behind them.
Vendor Published

Every change lands in an audit trail, and a time machine feature restores earlier versions. How often errors are caught before completion isn't published.

Operational and Outcome Evidence
CC on Operational and Outcome EvidenceUnnamed case studies, customer logos, or claims without numbers. Prestige is not measurement: the caliber of the client list describes the buyer rather than the product, and coverage statistics are not adoption statistics.
Vendor Published

The homepage names no customer and gives no figure. Support from Big 4 tax advisers and private equity firms appears only in the 2024 Series A release, and none of them is named.

AI Safety and Data Stewardship
CC on AI Safety and Data StewardshipGeneral assurances that do not answer the question this axis asks, which is whether one customer’s data trains models serving its competitors. Unbounded cross client learning stated with no boundary grades here too.
Vendor Published

How one sponsor's deal data is kept apart from another's, and whether any of it trains a model, isn't covered.

Regulatory and Compliance
GLBA and Data Privacy Posture
CC on GLBA and Data Privacy PostureA standard privacy policy that covers the website rather than the service, or silence on a product that touches limited consumer data.
Vendor Published

Investor and deal data sit on the platform, and the homepage offers no privacy terms, retention schedule or subprocessor list for them.

Security Certifications and Trust Center
CC on Security Certifications and Trust CenterA single footer line, or certifications asserted without being enumerated, which is weaker than naming them because it invites an assumption a buyer cannot check.
Vendor Published

Institutional grade security, controlled access and encryption are claimed for a platform that handles wiring schedules, but no certification or audit report backs them.

Regulatory Status and Licensure
CC on Regulatory Status and LicensureThe regulatory position is unstated. Most vendors in this index are technology suppliers and being unlicensed is the correct posture, so this grade records silence about the posture, not a missing license.
Vendor Published

Compliance and regulatory reporting are named as uses, yet no rule, regulator or registration is cited.

AI Governance and Bias Disclosure
CC on AI Governance and Bias DisclosureResponsible artificial intelligence committed to in policy language with no evaluation behind it, on a product whose bias surface is modest.
Vendor Published

Allocation of proceeds and fees depends on error detection, and how it performs on unusual structures goes unreported.

AI Liability and Recourse
CC on AI Liability and RecourseMechanisms that enable challenge, such as audit trails and source traceability, with nothing standing behind the output and no route for the person affected.
Vendor Published

If a synchronization error reached a wiring schedule, money could go to the wrong place, and nothing Pactio publishes says who would answer for it.

Integration and Deployment
Model Supply Chain Disclosure
CC on Model Supply Chain DisclosureThe architecture is described and no provider is named.
Vendor Published

Which model or cloud service, if any, processes deal terms isn't disclosed.

Core Systems and Integration Depth
CC on Core Systems and Integration DepthIntegration claimed through standards or connectors with no system named and nothing to verify.
Vendor Published

The platform is pitched as a collaborative cloud workspace, but it lists no link to fund administration, banking or document systems.

Deployment Model and Data Residency
CC on Deployment Model and Data ResidencyCloud only with nothing stated, which is the category norm.
Vendor Published

Cloud hosting is mentioned without a provider, region or private option.

Commercial
Commercial Transparency
CC on Commercial TransparencyNo price is published and engagement runs through a demo form, which is the norm in this index.
Vendor Published

There's no price, plan or billing unit, and nothing says whether a sponsor pays per deal, per fund or per user.

Institution and Segment Coverage
CC on Institution and Segment CoverageSegments claimed broadly, banks, fintechs, credit unions, without evidence any of them has its own maintained surface.
Vendor Published

Closings in private equity are the single use case, serving investors and the lawyers and administrators around them. That's one asset class and one stage of a deal.

Head to Head

Compared With

Most editorial comparisons pair two vendors the index assesses as direct competitors for the same buyer. Some pair vendors that are adjacent rather than rival, where the useful question is where one ends and the other begins. Each carries a verdict, the buyer conditions that favor each vendor, and a graded side by side.

Pactio vs GainRead the verdict →Pactio vs ClarumRead the verdict →

Alternatives to Pactio

Vendors in the same categories as Pactio whose profiles look most alike, each with a line on what the product does. Similar is not the same: check that each one does the job you need. No vendor pays for placement.

Artian

Artian builds multi agent AI for financial institutions.

MSCI

MSCI is a New York provider of indexes, risk analytics, ESG research and private capital data to the global investment community.

TeamSec

TeamSec runs a cloud securitization as a service platform for banks, investment banks, brokerage houses and asset originators.

Entrilia

Entrilia is an early stage, venture backed fund operations software company for private capital managers, seed funded by Watertower Ventures and selling front to back operations software to…

Evalueserve

Evalueserve is a global research, analytics and operations firm founded in 2000 and headquartered in Zurich, delivering knowledge work to clients across several industries from delivery…

KelAI

KelAI runs the whole systematic investment research loop autonomously for hedge funds and institutional investors, taking idea generation through data analysis, backtesting, signal…

The index publishes no overall score or ranking. See what we assess and the methodology.

Commercial

Pricing

Vendor-published figures are labeled as such. Figures labeled “Estimated” are derived from third-party sources and have not been confirmed by the vendor.

No pricing data has been verified for this vendor. Pricing information will be published here once confirmed through vendor disclosure or third-party estimation.

Contact us

Found a vendor we missed? Have feedback on the index? We’d love to hear from you.

AI FinTech Index

The AI FinTech Index is an independent index that tracks changes to AI vendors in financial services. It holds 610 vendors across banking, lending, insurance, wealth, capital markets and financial crime compliance, each graded on the same 15 capability axes from public sources. No vendor pays for inclusion, placement, or rating.

Index Status
Last index update
October 20, 2026
The AI FinTech Index is an editorial reference, not a regulatory body. Vendor data is verified against published sources and public regulatory filings. Figures labeled “Estimated” have not been confirmed by the vendor. See the Methodology page for evaluation standards and limitations.
© 2026 AI FinTech Index
3801 N Capital of Texas Hwy, Ste E240 · Austin, TX 78746