Capital Markets & Research AI
C

Clarum

Clarum builds AI agents for private equity and venture capital firms. The agents turn a firm's own deal memos, diligence materials, partner notes and returns into models the firm can query, and they handle due diligence, portfolio monitoring, fund reporting and investor communications.

Clarum says questions that used to take days now get answers in seconds, and it is working with a founding cohort of general and limited partners it doesn't name. It holds SOC 2 Type II, has its defenses tested by Oneleet and lets customers choose where their data is stored.

Clarum, Inc. is based in San Francisco.

Last VerifiedOctober 3, 2026
Compare Clarum with other vendors
Founded
2023
Headquarters
San Francisco, California, United States
Website
clarum.ai
Categories
capital-markets-ai, wealth-and-advisory
Assessment

Capability Axes

Capability grades

15 of 15 axes rated · 4 graded A or B

AI Capability
AI Centrality
AA on AI CentralityThe artificial intelligence is the product. Remove the models and there is nothing left to sell.
Vendor Published

Deal material goes in and agents do the work, reading it, structuring it into queryable models and running diligence, monitoring and reporting for each firm.

Autonomy and Oversight Model
CC on Autonomy and Oversight ModelAutonomy is claimed and oversight is asserted without a mechanism, or full automation is presented as the entire disclosure. Human in the loop appears as a phrase rather than a described control.
Vendor Published

End to end automation of each firm's process is the pitch, with agents that learn how the firm works. Where a person checks their output before it reaches an investment decision isn't set out.

Model Risk Management and Transparency
CC on Model Risk Management and TransparencyTransparency is claimed in general terms with no mechanism a model validator could interrogate.
Vendor Published

Recall matters most in diligence, since a missed liability costs more than a false flag, and no recall, accuracy or evaluation method is published for the agents.

Operational and Outcome Evidence
CC on Operational and Outcome EvidenceUnnamed case studies, customer logos, or claims without numbers. Prestige is not measurement: the caliber of the client list describes the buyer rather than the product, and coverage statistics are not adoption statistics.
Vendor Published

A founding cohort of general and limited partners is mentioned but never named. The one outcome claim, questions that took days now answered in seconds, has no measurement behind it.

AI Safety and Data Stewardship
CC on AI Safety and Data StewardshipGeneral assurances that do not answer the question this axis asks, which is whether one customer’s data trains models serving its competitors. Unbounded cross client learning stated with no boundary grades here too.
Vendor Published

Firms that bid against each other for the same deals share this platform, yet whether one firm's deal data is kept apart from another's, or used for training, goes unsaid.

Regulatory and Compliance
GLBA and Data Privacy Posture
BB on GLBA and Data Privacy PostureA substantive privacy document that reaches the product itself, short of the subprocessor list or the full data handling detail.
Vendor Published

The privacy policy, effective January 4, 2025, covers the product as well as the website and allows transfers abroad under standard contractual clauses. Data is kept as long as the service needs it, with no fixed period, even though data rooms often hold personal data.

Security Certifications and Trust Center
BB on Security Certifications and Trust CenterA recognized certification named in the vendor’s own material without the artifact, or with a scope or renewal question the buyer has to raise.
Vendor Published

A SOC 2 Type II attestation is claimed, and Oneleet tests the application and infrastructure. The report itself isn't offered, and there's no trust center.

Regulatory Status and Licensure
CC on Regulatory Status and LicensureThe regulatory position is unstated. Most vendors in this index are technology suppliers and being unlicensed is the correct posture, so this grade records silence about the posture, not a missing license.
Vendor Published

Recordkeeping and investor reporting duties sit with Clarum's clients, and Clarum names no regulator, rule or registration of its own.

AI Governance and Bias Disclosure
CC on AI Governance and Bias DisclosureResponsible artificial intelligence committed to in policy language with no evaluation behind it, on a product whose bias surface is modest.
Vendor Published

The agents choose which clauses, anomalies and risks to surface from a data room. Clarum publishes no evaluation of what they tend to overlook or how that varies by deal type.

AI Liability and Recourse
CC on AI Liability and RecourseMechanisms that enable challenge, such as audit trails and source traceability, with nothing standing behind the output and no route for the person affected.
Vendor Published

An agent that misses something material can lead a firm to misprice an acquisition, and there's no published warranty, service level or remedy.

Integration and Deployment
Model Supply Chain Disclosure
CC on Model Supply Chain DisclosureThe architecture is described and no provider is named.
Vendor Published

Which models read deal documents, and who hosts them, isn't disclosed. The privacy policy mentions vendors without naming one.

Core Systems and Integration Depth
CC on Core Systems and Integration DepthIntegration claimed through standards or connectors with no system named and nothing to verify.
Vendor Published

Data rooms, drives and CRMs are where deal material lives, and none of them is named as a connection.

Deployment Model and Data Residency
BB on Deployment Model and Data ResidencyStated residency commitments or regional hosting options.
Vendor Published

Customers pick where their data is stored from a set of regional options, and security settings such as single sign on and data policies can be customized.

Commercial
Commercial Transparency
CC on Commercial TransparencyNo price is published and engagement runs through a demo form, which is the norm in this index.
Vendor Published

Pricing is unpublished, with no plan or billing unit to say whether cost runs per seat, per firm or per deal.

Institution and Segment Coverage
CC on Institution and Segment CoverageSegments claimed broadly, banks, fintechs, credit unions, without evidence any of them has its own maintained surface.
Vendor Published

Private equity and venture capital firms, on both the general and limited partner side, are the only buyers named, which makes this a single segment.

Head to Head

Compared With

Most editorial comparisons pair two vendors the index assesses as direct competitors for the same buyer. Some pair vendors that are adjacent rather than rival, where the useful question is where one ends and the other begins. Each carries a verdict, the buyer conditions that favor each vendor, and a graded side by side.

Alternatives to Clarum

Vendors in the same categories as Clarum whose profiles look most alike, each with a line on what the product does. Similar is not the same: check that each one does the job you need. No vendor pays for placement.

Cohesion sells a team of monitoring agents to fundamental equity investors, tracking the companies an analyst covers across earnings calls, investor presentations, regulatory filings, news…

Keye automates the financial diligence that private equity and private credit teams run on a target company.

Samaya AI builds research agents for investment banks, sales and trading desks, hedge funds and asset managers.

KelAI runs the whole systematic investment research loop autonomously for hedge funds and institutional investors, taking idea generation through data analysis, backtesting, signal…

Artian builds multi agent AI for financial institutions.

Blue Fire AI sells Emmalyn, a proprietary neuro symbolic AI framework for active investment decisions, to large asset managers and other financial institutions.

The index publishes no overall score or ranking. See what we assess and the methodology.

Commercial

Pricing

Vendor-published figures are labeled as such. Figures labeled “Estimated” are derived from third-party sources and have not been confirmed by the vendor.

No pricing data has been verified for this vendor. Pricing information will be published here once confirmed through vendor disclosure or third-party estimation.

Contact us

Found a vendor we missed? Have feedback on the index? We’d love to hear from you.

AI FinTech Index

The AI FinTech Index is an independent index that tracks changes to AI vendors in financial services. It holds 610 vendors across banking, lending, insurance, wealth, capital markets and financial crime compliance, each graded on the same 15 capability axes from public sources. No vendor pays for inclusion, placement, or rating.

Index Status
Last index update
October 20, 2026
The AI FinTech Index is an editorial reference, not a regulatory body. Vendor data is verified against published sources and public regulatory filings. Figures labeled “Estimated” have not been confirmed by the vendor. See the Methodology page for evaluation standards and limitations.
© 2026 AI FinTech Index
3801 N Capital of Texas Hwy, Ste E240 · Austin, TX 78746