AML, KYC & Financial Crime
M

Meelo

Meelo is a French platform that combines identity verification, business verification, solvency assessment, AML screening, bank account validation and document control, so institutions stop assembling those checks from separate vendors. It cross analyzes more than 400 signals per person across documents, biometrics, the digital journey and contextual evidence, and its business checks assess more than 100 control points, returning a decision support score in two to five seconds with an explanation of which signals raised each alert. Analysts keep decision authority.

Bank data arrives through Powens under the second payment services directive and company data from Infogreffe and Pappers; the platform is hosted on Microsoft Azure in France, and its algorithms are said to be audited against an IEEE standard. Customers include Arkéa, Crédit Agricole, Ayvens, Arval and AXA across eight European countries.

Last VerifiedOctober 2, 2026
Compare Meelo with other vendors
Founded
2020
Headquarters
Lille, France
Categories
aml-kyc-financial-crime, fraud-and-transaction-risk, credit-decisioning
Assessment

Capability Axes

Capability grades

15 of 15 axes rated · 11 graded A or B

AI Capability
AI Centrality
AA on AI CentralityThe artificial intelligence is the product. Remove the models and there is nothing left to sell.
Vendor Published

Cross analysis of 400 signals per individual, spanning document authenticity, biometrics and behavior in the digital journey, returns a decision support score in two to five seconds from proprietary evolving AI. Manual file review across disconnected tools would be all that remained.

Autonomy and Oversight Model
BB on Autonomy and Oversight ModelA written commitment that the models work alongside human judgment, with real review surfaces, short of the full control structure: commonly the threshold at which the system stops or what happens after it is wrong.
Vendor Published

Critical alerts help the analyst prioritize rather than dictate the procedure, and analysts keep decision authority, with adapted controls for entrepreneurs and young companies. Thresholds, and what proceeds automatically where the product replaces an existing process, are not described.

Model Risk Management and Transparency
BB on Model Risk Management and TransparencyReal transparency mechanisms are published, such as per alert explainability, confidence scoring or split testing, without the validation package or supervisory mapping behind them.
Vendor Published

Each score comes with an explanation of why it was given and which signals raised the alert. Accuracy, false positive and detection rates are unpublished, and no supervisory mapping for the models is given.

Operational and Outcome Evidence
AA on Operational and Outcome EvidenceNamed customers with hard performance figures and enough method to test them.
Vendor Published

Arkéa Financements Services reports fraud risk divided by twelve, with no period or method. More than 60 clients include Crédit Agricole, Ayvens and AXA, and unnamed clients report 1.8 million euros saved over two years.

AI Safety and Data Stewardship
CC on AI Safety and Data StewardshipGeneral assurances that do not answer the question this axis asks, which is whether one customer’s data trains models serving its competitors. Unbounded cross client learning stated with no boundary grades here too.
Vendor Published

Banks, lenders and leasing groups competing for the same customers share the platform, and fraud detection typically improves by observing outcomes across all of them. Whether one client's fraud pattern informs scoring at another, and whether results are retained or reused, is not stated.

Regulatory and Compliance
GLBA and Data Privacy Posture
BB on GLBA and Data Privacy PostureA substantive privacy document that reaches the product itself, short of the subprocessor list or the full data handling detail.
Vendor Published

Full GDPR compliance is claimed, and an external audit is said to have rated privacy compliance excellent. The auditor, retention for verification and bank data and the subprocessors are not named.

Security Certifications and Trust Center
CC on Security Certifications and Trust CenterA single footer line, or certifications asserted without being enumerated, which is weaker than naming them because it invites an assumption a buyer cannot check.
Vendor Published

Encrypted storage and a business continuity plan are described, beside B Corp and EcoVadis Gold, which are sustainability credentials. An information security certification or trust portal appears nowhere on the pages.

Regulatory Status and Licensure
BB on Regulatory Status and LicensureThe regulatory position is clearly stated and appropriate to the product, with part of the verification left to the buyer.
Vendor Published

The GDPR, PSD2 for bank data access, the new AML regulation and sixth AML directive, and eIDAS 2.0 are named design targets, with PSD3 and FiDA ahead. France's banking supervisor never appears.

AI Governance and Bias Disclosure
BB on AI Governance and Bias DisclosureAn independent demographic evaluation the vendor has submitted to, such as the NIST face evaluation class, or a governance framework with named process behind it.
Vendor Published

Algorithms are audited against an IEEE standard for fair, transparent and explainable AI, and a team supervises model performance and machine bias. Audit results, the auditing body and acceptance rates by population are not published.

AI Liability and Recourse
CC on AI Liability and RecourseMechanisms that enable challenge, such as audit trails and source traceability, with nothing standing behind the output and no route for the person affected.
Vendor Published

Score explanations let an analyst reconstruct, justify or overturn a decision, but no guarantee or accuracy commitment stands behind them. Applicants rejected over a poorly scanned document or an atypical profile are not told which signal caused it and are offered no route to contest.

Integration and Deployment
Model Supply Chain Disclosure
BB on Model Supply Chain DisclosureSubstantial partial disclosure, or a chain that is structurally short: an explicit in house build, on premise deployment, per customer instances, or zero retention at the model layer.
Vendor Published

Infogreffe and Pappers supply official company data, and the models are described as proprietary. Neither the watchlist source nor the biometric and document engines are identified, which matters for a sovereignty pitch.

Core Systems and Integration Depth
BB on Core Systems and Integration DepthNamed systems or a documented public API, with the depth or the production evidence left open.
Vendor Published

A portal, native API or batch processing enriches existing journeys, with Powens as open banking provider and deployment in about four weeks. No core banking, loan origination or onboarding system is named, and API documentation is not linked.

Deployment Model and Data Residency
BB on Deployment Model and Data ResidencyStated residency commitments or regional hosting options.
Vendor Published

Data stays on Microsoft Azure in France with no transfer outside European territory. Its platform is offered only as SaaS, with no private or on premises option.

Commercial
Commercial Transparency
CC on Commercial TransparencyNo price is published and engagement runs through a demo form, which is the norm in this index.
Vendor Published

Consolidating checks otherwise bought from several vendors is the stated cost argument, yet nothing is priced. Per check, per verified customer or subscription charging, and the relative price of each module, are never given.

Institution and Segment Coverage
BB on Institution and Segment CoverageNamed segments with dedicated material behind part of the coverage.
Vendor Published

Individual and business verification, AML screening and solvency assessment sit in one platform, serving banks, leasing and mobility groups and insurers. Coverage runs across eight countries, while dedicated material by institution type is thinner than the product pages.

Head to Head

Compared With

Most editorial comparisons pair two vendors the index assesses as direct competitors for the same buyer. Some pair vendors that are adjacent rather than rival, where the useful question is where one ends and the other begins. Each carries a verdict, the buyer conditions that favor each vendor, and a graded side by side.

Alternatives to Meelo

Vendors in the same categories as Meelo whose profiles look most alike, each with a line on what the product does. Similar is not the same: check that each one does the job you need. No vendor pays for placement.

Microblink builds computer vision and biometric models for identity document capture, authentication and verification, sold to banks, lenders, fintechs and payment providers as software…

Quantifind runs risk screening and investigations for financial crime through its Graphyte platform, resolving entities and scoring risk from billions of external sources covering sanctions…

smartKYC automates counterparty due diligence for private banks, corporate and investment banks, retail banks, wealth managers and multinational corporates through smartEYE for Banks and…

Duna is a business identity platform for regulated companies, automating know your business, know your customer, customer due diligence and anti money laundering checks during onboarding.

Incode Technologies is a San Francisco identity verification and biometric authentication company selling to banks, credit unions, neobanks, fintechs, telecoms, marketplaces and government…

Mozn is a Riyadh enterprise AI company, founded in 2017, and FOCAL is its platform for financial institutions fighting money laundering and fraud.

The index publishes no overall score or ranking. See what we assess and the methodology.

Commercial

Pricing

Vendor-published figures are labeled as such. Figures labeled “Estimated” are derived from third-party sources and have not been confirmed by the vendor.

No pricing data has been verified for this vendor. Pricing information will be published here once confirmed through vendor disclosure or third-party estimation.

Contact us

Found a vendor we missed? Have feedback on the index? We’d love to hear from you.

AI FinTech Index

The AI FinTech Index is an independent index that tracks changes to AI vendors in financial services. It holds 610 vendors across banking, lending, insurance, wealth, capital markets and financial crime compliance, each graded on the same 15 capability axes from public sources. No vendor pays for inclusion, placement, or rating.

Index Status
Last index update
October 20, 2026
The AI FinTech Index is an editorial reference, not a regulatory body. Vendor data is verified against published sources and public regulatory filings. Figures labeled “Estimated” have not been confirmed by the vendor. See the Methodology page for evaluation standards and limitations.
© 2026 AI FinTech Index
3801 N Capital of Texas Hwy, Ste E240 · Austin, TX 78746