First AML
First AML is an Auckland customer due diligence platform founded in 2017, co founded by Bion Behdin who serves as chief revenue officer, and now operating across New Zealand, Australia, the United Kingdom and Europe with separate platform instances for the Australasian and UK and European regions. The company began as a compliance operator rather than a software vendor and states it processed more than two million anti money laundering cases itself before releasing the platform, which is the experience it markets the product on.
It sells an end to end customer due diligence workflow covering onboarding, individual and business verification, screening, enhanced and ongoing due diligence, risk assessment and regulatory reporting, aimed at organizations with complex or international entity structures. Four named AI features sit inside it. Entity Insights searches public records, registries and credit data to produce a structured open source report on an entity with follow up questions, aimed specifically at foreign entities and thin data jurisdictions.
An AI document reader parses trust deeds, constitutions and other complex documents in around sixty seconds, extracts beneficial owners and certification details and builds the ownership structure inside the case. AI supported individual verification captures live video alongside an identity document and matches faces biometrically. Advanced AI screening surfaces court proceedings, criminal filings and paywalled content, and a screening agent labels each result as a false positive, false match or true match for a human to accept or override.
The company frames the arrangement as the customer owning the compliance rules and review steps while the AI runs against them, clears routine work and escalates cases needing judgment. It serves four industries, accounting, law and conveyancing, real estate, and finance, and in February 2026 partnered with the legal software group Aderant to reach law firms internationally. It runs a trust center on Drata, a security page, a public status page and a published plans and pricing page.
Capability Axes
Capability grades
15 of 15 axes rated · 7 graded A or B
Before building the platform, First AML processed more than two million cases as an operator, so its workflow, case management and screening product functioned before any AI arrived. The models add a document reader that parses trust deeds and builds ownership structures, biometric identity matching and a screening agent that triages results.
Compliance rules and review steps belong to the customer's team, and the screening agent labels each result a false positive, false match or true match for a person to accept or override. What counts as routine, or what the agent may close without review, is not stated.
Published figures measure speed, such as a complex document read in around sixty seconds, not correctness. Extraction accuracy and precision or recall for the screening agent's labels are unpublished, though an accepted false positive label makes a real match disappear.
Rampersand, Blackbird and Alceon are among six financial firms named on the Australian pricing page, alongside scale stated as thousands of companies and millions of clients verified. No outcome attaches to any of them, and a 50 to 80 percent cut in due diligence time in its own commentary is unattributed.
Its own commentary floats reinforcement learning on case outcomes and federated learning across institutions as opportunities, yet whether customer data or analyst decisions train shared models is not stated. AI data use is left out of the security statement entirely.
Platform activity logs are kept up to a year and customer specific audit logs for the customer's lifetime, but no subprocessor list, case document retention schedule or processing terms are published. Identity documents, trust deeds and beneficial ownership details of its customers' customers sit in those case records.
ISO 27001:2022 certification with annual audits is stated, and a Drata trust center lists SOC 2, ISO 27001 and SSAE 18 reports beside a public status page. Neither the SOC 2 report type nor report access without a request is shown.
Statutory obligations sit with its customers as reporting entities, and First AML states no license, registration or sandbox of its own. Detailed commentary on New Zealand and Australian regulatory change is subject matter knowledge, not standing.
Commentary names bias as a central risk of AI in this field, yet nothing addresses its own models: no fairness disclosure or evaluation across jurisdictions or entity types. Entity research aims at foreign entities in thin data jurisdictions, where public records are sparse, so reports may be incomplete exactly where buyers lean on them.
A person wrongly listed as a beneficial owner from a trust deed, or wrongly left off, gets no notice that an automated reading produced the entry and no route to correct it. First AML publishes nothing on who bears the cost of an extraction error.
Document understanding, facial biometrics and screening triage name no model provider, family or version. Where inference runs, and whether documents reach an external model provider, goes unexplained.
Aderant's legal practice management software now embeds the compliance workflow through a February 2026 partnership, reaching law firms where they already work. Beyond that, the integration catalog is not enumerated, so which customer or fund administration systems connect is unclear.
Two AWS instances are named by region: Asia Pacific data in Sydney with recovery in Melbourne, and European data in Ireland with recovery in Frankfurt. On premises and single tenant options are not offered, and no formal transfer position is published.
Three tiers are described by the organization each suits, with every price marked on application and varying by jurisdiction. Its entry tier's qualifying volume of 400 individuals or 100 complex entities a year tells a firm whether it fits, but nothing about cost.
New Zealand, Australia, the United Kingdom and Europe each have a site, across accounting, law, real estate and finance. Finance is listed last of four verticals, and the base leans toward professional services firms with anti money laundering duties.
Alternatives to First AML
Vendors in the same categories as First AML whose profiles look most alike, each with a line on what the product does. Similar is not the same: check that each one does the job you need. No vendor pays for placement.
Dotfile is a Paris business verification platform founded in 2021 by Vasco Alexandre and Titouan Benoit inside the startup studio Hexa, formerly eFounders, with offices in San Francisco and London.
Duna is a business identity platform for regulated companies, automating know your business, know your customer, customer due diligence and anti money laundering checks during onboarding.
Ripjar sells enterprise screening to institutions that already have a screening system and are overwhelmed by what it produces.
Boost Capital gives banks, microfinance institutions and other financial service providers a white labeled way to onboard customers through chat platforms people already use, including…
Enqura sells a five product platform to banks, fintechs, payment providers and insurers: EnQualify for identity verification, EnSecure for strong authentication, EnNovate for digital…
Nufi verifies people and businesses in Mexico through background check reports, identity validation APIs, a business verification product and a document extraction service.
The index publishes no overall score or ranking. See what we assess and the methodology.
Pricing
Vendor-published figures are labeled as such. Figures labeled “Estimated” are derived from third-party sources and have not been confirmed by the vendor.
No pricing data has been verified for this vendor. Pricing information will be published here once confirmed through vendor disclosure or third-party estimation.