Compliance, Surveillance & RegTech
I

Intelligo Group

Intelligo sells AI due diligence and background checks to asset allocators, private equity, real estate, lending and banking clients. Its Clarity platform screens people and companies and keeps monitoring them.

Models search legal, regulatory, media, social, financial and career sources, score each finding for relevance to cut false positives, and flag signs of fraud or financial distress. Clients choose automated reports, Advantage reports that add a human analyst, or continuous monitoring. Intelligo also runs pre employment checks and handles candidate consent and FCRA compliance for them.

Carrick Capital Partners has invested in Intelligo. The company has launched an Intelligo Compliance MCP Server and a partnership with RANE.

Last VerifiedOctober 2, 2026
Compare Intelligo Group with other vendors
Founded
—
Headquarters
—
Categories
compliance-and-surveillance, capital-markets-ai, wealth-and-advisory
Assessment

Capability Axes

Capability grades

15 of 15 axes rated · 7 graded A or B

AI Capability
AI Centrality
AA on AI CentralityThe artificial intelligence is the product. Remove the models and there is nothing left to sell.
Vendor Published

Dynamic queries tuned to each subject and source, and pattern detection such as a legal incident coinciding with a debt, are the work the models do. Manual analyst research, the incumbent the company set out to replace, is what removing them would bring back.

Autonomy and Oversight Model
BB on Autonomy and Oversight ModelA written commitment that the models work alongside human judgment, with real review surfaces, short of the full control structure: commonly the threshold at which the system stops or what happens after it is wrong.
Vendor Published

Automated reports are compiled mainly by the AI platform, while Advantage reports add a human analyst who connects findings more deeply. What an analyst checks in an automated report, if anything, and how a disagreement between model and analyst is settled are not described.

Model Risk Management and Transparency
BB on Model Risk Management and TransparencyReal transparency mechanisms are published, such as per alert explainability, confidence scoring or split testing, without the validation package or supervisory mapping behind them.
Vendor Published

Each item gets a relevance score against verified facts, feedback training targets false positives, and a client can open any red or yellow flag to see what lies behind it. False negatives, the history a report missed, have no published detection rate or benchmark.

Operational and Outcome Evidence
BB on Operational and Outcome EvidenceVendor aggregate claims with real figures, or audited scale disclosures from a publicly listed company.
Vendor Published

Vincent Taurassi of Sentinel Capital Partners, Cameron Willcott of Techstars and Hamilton Lane's head of operational due diligence are quoted on speed, depth and accuracy. Carrick Capital Partners has invested, and no report volume or detection outcome is joined to any named firm.

AI Safety and Data Stewardship
CC on AI Safety and Data StewardshipGeneral assurances that do not answer the question this axis asks, which is whether one customer’s data trains models serving its competitors. Unbounded cross client learning stated with no boundary grades here too.
Vendor Published

Algorithms improve through feedback from internal research and product teams rather than client activity, and customer data is processed only on the customer's instructions. Whether a report commissioned by one fund, or the subject profile behind it, informs what a competing fund receives is not answered.

Regulatory and Compliance
GLBA and Data Privacy Posture
BB on GLBA and Data Privacy PostureA substantive privacy document that reaches the product itself, short of the subprocessor list or the full data handling detail.
Vendor Published

Under a data processing addendum Intelligo acts as processor of customer data, with Prighter as its EU and UK representative and a named data protection officer, per the privacy policy updated July 3, 2025. Retention follows an undisclosed internal policy and no subprocessor list is published, for a payload of profiles on people who are not customers.

Security Certifications and Trust Center
CC on Security Certifications and Trust CenterA single footer line, or certifications asserted without being enumerated, which is weaker than naming them because it invites an assumption a buyer cannot check.
Vendor Published

Industry standard measures get one paragraph in the privacy policy, and no attestation, certification or trust center is published. Executives and candidates who never consented to their profiles would be exposed by a breach.

Regulatory Status and Licensure
BB on Regulatory Status and LicensureThe regulatory position is clearly stated and appropriate to the product, with part of the verification left to the buyer.
Vendor Published

Candidate consent forms and Fair Credit Reporting Act compliance are taken on for pre employment checks, and the privacy policy names roles under the GDPR, the CCPA and Israel's Protection of Privacy Law. Investment diligence products carry no stated regulatory position.

AI Governance and Bias Disclosure
DD on AI Governance and Bias DisclosureNothing published on a product where the bias risk is concrete, such as credit decisioning or underwriting with no fair lending, disparate impact or adverse action disclosure.
Vendor Published

Adverse findings about named individuals decide investments, loans and jobs, and every technique behind them errs unevenly: name matching degrades outside English conventions, adverse media favors heavily reported markets and legal records vary by jurisdiction. Error analysis by jurisdiction or group and fairness testing are unpublished.

AI Liability and Recourse
CC on AI Liability and RecourseMechanisms that enable challenge, such as audit trails and source traceability, with nothing standing behind the output and no route for the person affected.
Vendor Published

Rectification and erasure requests for data held in a report route to the commissioning customer. The person profiled is not notified a check was run, and Intelligo publishes no commitment on the accuracy of reports clients act on.

Integration and Deployment
Model Supply Chain Disclosure
CC on Model Supply Chain DisclosureThe architecture is described and no provider is named.
Vendor Published

Legal, regulatory, media and professional history sources are described by category only, beside proprietary models. Which provider produced a hit is unknown, though the reliability of an adverse finding depends on it.

Core Systems and Integration Depth
CC on Core Systems and Integration DepthIntegration claimed through standards or connectors with no system named and nothing to verify.
Vendor Published

Delivery runs through the Clarity platform, with an Intelligo Compliance MCP Server and a partnership with RANE announced. Customer relationship, case management and investor portal systems are not named, and no developer documentation is published.

Deployment Model and Data Residency
CC on Deployment Model and Data ResidencyCloud only with nothing stated, which is the category norm.
Vendor Published

Israel, the United States and other locations as reasonably necessary are where data is stored and processed, with standard contractual clauses for European transfers. A list ending in other locations is not a residency commitment, and hosting provider and region choice are not given.

Commercial
Commercial Transparency
CC on Commercial TransparencyNo price is published and engagement runs through a demo form, which is the norm in this index.
Vendor Published

Pricing options vary by use case and need, the FAQ says, and buyers are routed to a demo. Automated reports, deeper analyst work and continuous monitoring are distinct scopes, and neither a unit nor a rate is given for any of them.

Institution and Segment Coverage
BB on Institution and Segment CoverageNamed segments with dedicated material behind part of the coverage.
Vendor Published

Asset allocators, private equity and lending teams are named buyers, with use case pages for investment and operational due diligence and lending transaction screening. Pre employment background checks form a separate line under a different regulatory frame.

Head to Head

Compared With

Most editorial comparisons pair two vendors the index assesses as direct competitors for the same buyer. Some pair vendors that are adjacent rather than rival, where the useful question is where one ends and the other begins. Each carries a verdict, the buyer conditions that favor each vendor, and a graded side by side.

Alternatives to Intelligo Group

Vendors in the same categories as Intelligo Group whose profiles look most alike, each with a line on what the product does. Similar is not the same: check that each one does the job you need. No vendor pays for placement.

Shiboleth automates consumer lending compliance for banks, fintechs and non-bank lenders, and serves as a monitoring layer for banks overseeing their fintech partnerships.

Acin sells operational risk data and AI tools to large banks and other financial institutions.

Exiger assesses risk in the third parties, suppliers and customers an organization depends on.

NuArca Labs sells NuComply, a large language model compliance assistant built for banks and other financial institutions.

Solidus Labs provides trade surveillance, transaction monitoring and compliance workflows for crypto and traditional markets through its HALO platform, which combines surveillance…

Luthor reviews regulated marketing before it goes live and describes itself as an artificial intelligence native compliance firm rather than a pure software vendor.

The index publishes no overall score or ranking. See what we assess and the methodology.

Commercial

Pricing

Vendor-published figures are labeled as such. Figures labeled “Estimated” are derived from third-party sources and have not been confirmed by the vendor.

No pricing data has been verified for this vendor. Pricing information will be published here once confirmed through vendor disclosure or third-party estimation.

Contact us

Found a vendor we missed? Have feedback on the index? We’d love to hear from you.

AI FinTech Index

The AI FinTech Index is an independent index that tracks changes to AI vendors in financial services. It holds 610 vendors across banking, lending, insurance, wealth, capital markets and financial crime compliance, each graded on the same 15 capability axes from public sources. No vendor pays for inclusion, placement, or rating.

Index Status
Last index update
October 20, 2026
The AI FinTech Index is an editorial reference, not a regulatory body. Vendor data is verified against published sources and public regulatory filings. Figures labeled “Estimated” have not been confirmed by the vendor. See the Methodology page for evaluation standards and limitations.
© 2026 AI FinTech Index
3801 N Capital of Texas Hwy, Ste E240 · Austin, TX 78746