AML, KYC & Financial Crime
B

Bits Technology

Bits Technology, trading as Bits and registered in Sweden as Finbits AB, is a Stockholm compliance infrastructure platform founded in 2022 by former operators from Klarna, Amazon Web Services and Tink, led by cofounder and chief executive Jonatan Klintberg. It sells a single integration that replaces a stack of local point solutions, covering know your customer and know your business onboarding, a configurable AML risk score, ongoing due diligence across more than 1,300 lists, transaction monitoring built for the EU's AMLR 2027 requirements, and case management with audit trails across more than 100 markets.

Through one connection customers reach more than 60 data sources, including Bolagsverket, SCB, Companies House and PRH, electronic identity schemes such as BankID, MitID, itsme and DigiD, and Veriff for identity verification. A no code workflow builder configures the process and the platform is delivered API first with public developer documentation. Bits AI adds an agent that summarizes raw case data and drafts an actionable decision which a human then verifies or edits, plus a co pilot that answers questions across case data, and Bits describes its role as sorting, summarizing and surfacing rather than deciding. Named customers include Alisa Bank, Qliro, Walley, Brite Payments, Coinmotion, Lesslie, CleverCards and 0to9, and Bits reports a 3.8 times return over five years for customers.

Last VerifiedOctober 2, 2026
Compare Bits Technology with other vendors
Founded
2022
Headquarters
Stockholm, Sweden
Website
www.bits.bi
Categories
aml-kyc-financial-crime, compliance-and-surveillance, fraud-and-transaction-risk
Assessment

Capability Axes

Capability grades

15 of 15 axes rated · 4 graded A or B

AI Capability
AI Centrality
CC on AI CentralityArtificial intelligence is present but peripheral: a feature layer on a product whose value stands without it.
Vendor Published

AI is scoped on purpose to sorting, summarizing and surfacing, with agents delivering cases rather than deciding them. The orchestration layer, workflow builder and case management would all remain without it.

Autonomy and Oversight Model
BB on Autonomy and Oversight ModelA written commitment that the models work alongside human judgment, with real review surfaces, short of the full control structure: commonly the threshold at which the system stops or what happens after it is wrong.
Vendor Published

Raw case data is summarized and a decision drafted by the agent, then a person verifies or edits it, with risk based routing concentrating review on higher risk customers. That human step reads as permitted rather than enforced, and the threshold that defines higher risk is unpublished.

Model Risk Management and Transparency
CC on Model Risk Management and TransparencyTransparency is claimed in general terms with no mechanism a model validator could interrogate.
Vendor Published

Every published number measures work removed rather than decisions made correctly. Reviewers read the agent's summary first, yet its faithfulness has no published measure.

Operational and Outcome Evidence
BB on Operational and Outcome EvidenceVendor aggregate claims with real figures, or audited scale disclosures from a publicly listed company.
Vendor Published

Executives at Qliro, Walley and Brite Payments are quoted by name on the customer page. A 3.8 times return over five years and onboarding in minutes rather than days are platform claims tied to no named customer.

AI Safety and Data Stewardship
CC on AI Safety and Data StewardshipGeneral assurances that do not answer the question this axis asks, which is whether one customer’s data trains models serving its competitors. Unbounded cross client learning stated with no boundary grades here too.
Vendor Published

Corrections that analysts make to drafted decisions are exactly what a system would learn from, and the platform holds case data from competing payments firms. Whether case data, documents or analyst edits train the agent is not stated.

Regulatory and Compliance
GLBA and Data Privacy Posture
CC on GLBA and Data Privacy PostureA standard privacy policy that covers the website rather than the service, or silence on a product that touches limited consumer data.
Vendor Published

Terms, privacy and security share one combined legal page beside a GDPR compliant marker, and no subprocessor list, retention schedule or data processing terms appear. Customer and beneficial owner data passes through an orchestrated chain of registries, identity schemes and verification providers, which makes the missing subprocessor list the pointed gap.

Security Certifications and Trust Center
CC on Security Certifications and Trust CenterA single footer line, or certifications asserted without being enumerated, which is weaker than naming them because it invites an assumption a buyer cannot check.
Vendor Published

A marketing strip reads security first, verified providers, encrypted data and GDPR compliant, naming nothing a buyer could check. Certification, attestation and trust portal are all unpublished, and the footer's security link leads to the legal page.

Regulatory Status and Licensure
CC on Regulatory Status and LicensureThe regulatory position is unstated. Most vendors in this index are technology suppliers and being unlicensed is the correct posture, so this grade records silence about the posture, not a missing license.
Vendor Published

Incorporated in Sweden as Finbits AB, the company states no license, registration or supervised program of its own. Material on the incoming EU anti money laundering regulation, with monitoring built for AMLR 2027, is subject matter knowledge, not regulatory status.

AI Governance and Bias Disclosure
CC on AI Governance and Bias DisclosureResponsible artificial intelligence committed to in policy language with no evaluation behind it, on a product whose bias surface is modest.
Vendor Published

Automation bias is the design's exposure: the drafted summary frames what the compliance analyst concludes before review begins, and an analyst measured on cases cleared leans toward confirming. Acceptance rates by customer type and matching performance across naming conventions are not published.

AI Liability and Recourse
CC on AI Liability and RecourseMechanisms that enable challenge, such as audit trails and source traceability, with nothing standing behind the output and no route for the person affected.
Vendor Published

Audit trails in case management let an institution reconstruct and contest an outcome, but nothing says who bears the cost of a wrong decision. Error splits across third party providers, the orchestrator and the institution, and the firm describes no route for a wrongly refused business to correct an upstream record.

Integration and Deployment
Model Supply Chain Disclosure
CC on Model Supply Chain DisclosureThe architecture is described and no provider is named.
Vendor Published

Registries, identity schemes and Veriff make up a disclosed data chain, while the models behind the agent and co pilot have no named provider or processing country. Nothing says whether beneficial ownership details reach an external model provider.

Core Systems and Integration Depth
AA on Core Systems and Integration DepthNamed integrations with the systems of record, core banking, policy administration, custodial or contact center platforms, verifiable in marketplace listings or public API documentation.
Vendor Published

Bolagsverket, Companies House and PRH registries, BankID, MitID and itsme identity schemes and Veriff all connect through one integration, alongside more than 60 data sources and 1,300 sanctions, politically exposed person and watch lists. Public developer documentation and an API reference make the surface inspectable before contracting.

Deployment Model and Data Residency
CC on Deployment Model and Data ResidencyCloud only with nothing stated, which is the category norm.
Vendor Published

Case files and beneficial ownership records rest in an undisclosed location: the multi tenant platform names no cloud provider, region or private option.

Commercial
Commercial Transparency
CC on Commercial TransparencyNo price is published and engagement runs through a demo form, which is the norm in this index.
Vendor Published

The underlying providers are metered separately, so pricing could follow checks, entities or enabled providers, and none of it is published. Free trials start from the homepage, with no word on billing afterward.

Institution and Segment Coverage
BB on Institution and Segment CoverageNamed segments with dedicated material behind part of the coverage.
Vendor Published

Alisa Bank, a Finnish small business bank, sits beside buy now pay later firms and the crypto platform Coinmotion, with registries and identity schemes across the Nordics, the Benelux and the United Kingdom. Pages are built around onboarding, monitoring and case management, not around kinds of institution.

Tracked Since Listing

Product updates

Material product, regulatory, evidence and commercial changes at Bits Technology, each verified against a live source and tagged to the capability axis it bears on. Funding rounds and awards are not product changes and are not logged.

Oct 15, 2026Product / capability

Bits Procedures can now pause while waiting for an outcome, such as a provider check, and resume automatically, with executions showing a Waiting status and timings. Custom screens now run inside procedure executions to guide reviewers step by step, and transaction monitoring rolling windows now go down to the minute. The same release adds Malta as a supported onboarding market.

Bears on: Autonomy and Oversight ModelSource
Sep 15, 2026Product / capability

Bits Technology added power of attorney support for organization stakeholders during onboarding, and expanded risk classification for Finnish companies to cover all industry and legal form codes. The release also improves the speed and precision of PEP and sanctions screening.

Bears on: Institution and Segment CoverageSource
Our read on these updates →Tracked since Sep 2026

Alternatives to Bits Technology

Vendors in the same categories as Bits Technology whose profiles look most alike, each with a line on what the product does. Similar is not the same: check that each one does the job you need. No vendor pays for placement.

Boost Capital gives banks, microfinance institutions and other financial service providers a white labeled way to onboard customers through chat platforms people already use, including…

Enqura sells a five product platform to banks, fintechs, payment providers and insurers: EnQualify for identity verification, EnSecure for strong authentication, EnNovate for digital…

Dotfile is a Paris business verification platform founded in 2021 by Vasco Alexandre and Titouan Benoit inside the startup studio Hexa, formerly eFounders, with offices in San Francisco and London.

NICE Actimize sells financial crime risk management to banks and financial institutions.

First AML is an Auckland customer due diligence platform founded in 2017, co founded by Bion Behdin who serves as chief revenue officer, and now operating across New Zealand, Australia, the…

Harmoney orchestrates counterparty compliance for European insurers, banks, wealth managers, fund platforms, leasing groups and payment companies, covering identification and validation…

The index publishes no overall score or ranking. See what we assess and the methodology.

Commercial

Pricing

Vendor-published figures are labeled as such. Figures labeled “Estimated” are derived from third-party sources and have not been confirmed by the vendor.

No pricing data has been verified for this vendor. Pricing information will be published here once confirmed through vendor disclosure or third-party estimation.

Contact us

Found a vendor we missed? Have feedback on the index? We’d love to hear from you.

AI FinTech Index

The AI FinTech Index is an independent index that tracks changes to AI vendors in financial services. It holds 610 vendors across banking, lending, insurance, wealth, capital markets and financial crime compliance, each graded on the same 15 capability axes from public sources. No vendor pays for inclusion, placement, or rating.

Index Status
Last index update
October 20, 2026
The AI FinTech Index is an editorial reference, not a regulatory body. Vendor data is verified against published sources and public regulatory filings. Figures labeled “Estimated” have not been confirmed by the vendor. See the Methodology page for evaluation standards and limitations.
© 2026 AI FinTech Index
3801 N Capital of Texas Hwy, Ste E240 · Austin, TX 78746