AML, KYC & Financial Crime
E

Entrust

Entrust sells identity verification to banks, payment companies and other regulated institutions on the Onfido technology it acquired in 2024. Four sets of models do the core work: face matching, liveness and anti spoofing, data extraction from identity documents, and document fraud detection. Each check returns a Clear or Consider result, and a Consider result comes with the reasons behind it.

Workflow Studio lets an institution combine document checks, biometrics, data checks against registries and watchlists, and passive fraud signals into journeys tuned to its own risk and friction. Entrust also makes the card issuance systems banks run in branches, so verifying a customer and issuing a debit card can happen in one flow. Verification data sits on Amazon Web Services in the institution's choice of European Union, Canada or United States instance.

Last VerifiedOctober 13, 2026
Compare Entrust with other vendors
Founded
—
Headquarters
Shakopee, Minnesota, United States
Categories
aml-kyc-financial-crime, fraud-and-transaction-risk, customer-banking-agents
Assessment

Capability Axes

Capability grades

15 of 15 axes rated · 13 graded A or B

AI Capability
AI Centrality
BB on AI CentralityThe models are the engine of a core capability, layered on a product that would still function without them as a rules or workflow system.
Vendor Published

Document intelligence and facial biometrics do the judging, with deepfake, synthetic identity and injection attack detection alongside. Orchestration, data connections and the authentication products would still be useful without the models.

Autonomy and Oversight Model
AA on Autonomy and Oversight ModelWhat the system runs alone, what constrains it, and how a person checks it are all published: modes, thresholds, sampling or audit controls, and the route a case takes to human review.
Vendor Published

Trained analysts review and validate model outputs, and about 3 percent of all checks are sampled at random each month to measure accuracy. In certain products, human specialists assess results in real time when the models meet unusual or uncertain inputs, and models pass dashboard review and controlled A/B tests before release. Selfie Auto and Motion compare faces with no human review, while document, face and proof of address checks can route to reviewers at named outsourcing firms. Workflow Studio sets which checks apply to which users.

Model Risk Management and Transparency
BB on Model Risk Management and TransparencyReal transparency mechanisms are published, such as per alert explainability, confidence scoring or split testing, without the validation package or supervisory mapping behind them.
Vendor Published

Every Consider result carries a breakdown of the reasons, drawn from the models and any human review behind the check. False acceptance and false rejection rates are estimated on a random sample of production checks but not published, and the validation work is not tied to a supervisory framework. iBeta certified the liveness models at presentation attack detection Level 1 for selfie and Level 2 for motion under the ISO 30107 3 protocol.

Operational and Outcome Evidence
AA on Operational and Outcome EvidenceNamed customers with hard performance figures and enough method to test them.
Vendor Published

Principal Financial Group raised authentication success 10 percent, cut abandonment 34 percent and went from selection to full deployment in under five months, while MACH lifted conversion 48 percent. Revolut and the UK Home Office, for its Electronic Travel Authorization system, are also named.

AI Safety and Data Stewardship
BB on AI Safety and Data StewardshipA categorical stewardship commitment is published without the retention schedule or the engineering detail behind it.
Vendor Published

Check data from every customer trains the shared models by default, and a customer can opt out through account configuration. An opt out removes its checks from model training and from the monthly quality sample, though pseudonymized, aggregated data may still feed analytics and benchmarking. How long training data is kept is not published. Data is encrypted in transit and at rest, and access to the models and their data is limited to staff whose work requires it.

Regulatory and Compliance
GLBA and Data Privacy Posture
AA on GLBA and Data Privacy PostureThe privacy architecture is published in the specifics: data handling, retention, and a subprocessor list, which is rare in this index and valuable.
Vendor Published

Entrust acts as processor for the institution under its identity verification product privacy notice, last updated September 30, 2026, which sets out what each check handles, from document images and extracted fields to face scans, device signals and data provider results. Retention follows the institution's instructions within limits Entrust sets.

Face scans from a biometric check are not kept once the check completes, and scans held for repeat fraud checks or authentication are capped at 365 days. A public subprocessor list names every party that touches user data, with its location and purpose. Onfido Ltd acts as controller when check data is used to develop the service, where the law allows.

Security Certifications and Trust Center
BB on Security Certifications and Trust CenterA recognized certification named in the vendor’s own material without the artifact, or with a scope or renewal question the buyer has to raise.
Vendor Published

Entrust's ISO/IEC 27001:2022 certificate covers the whole organization and can be downloaded, the identity verification business carries its own ISO 27001 certificate from ControlCase that a buyer can check on the certifier's site, and ISO 27701 adds a privacy management certification audited every year. A SOC 2 Type II report is named but not offered for download, and detailed penetration test results stay inside Entrust unless law or regulation requires otherwise. A vendor information security addendum is published, and the identity verification service runs its own vulnerability disclosure program.

Regulatory Status and Licensure
AA on Regulatory Status and LicensureThe regulatory position is stated and a formal admission process stands behind it: a register entry, an eCBSV enrollment, a payment network partner admission, or presence inside SAR or CTR filing paths.
Vendor Published

Certification at the high confidence H1A profile under the UK Digital Identity and Attributes Trust Framework, whose certified services sit on a public register, comes with European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI) TS 119 461 certification for identity proofing. Accredited bodies assess services under that framework before they are listed.

AI Governance and Bias Disclosure
BB on AI Governance and Bias DisclosureAn independent demographic evaluation the vendor has submitted to, such as the NIST face evaluation class, or a governance framework with named process behind it.
Vendor Published

Performance is evaluated regularly across countries, continents and genders, and when a gap appears the training data, sampling or calibration is adjusted. Per group error rates and the full evaluation method are not published. The transparency notice names the likely sources of bias, from training data that overrepresents some regions to image quality and capture conditions, and points to the report the Information Commissioner's Office published on Onfido's time in its regulatory sandbox.

AI Liability and Recourse
CC on AI Liability and RecourseMechanisms that enable challenge, such as audit trails and source traceability, with nothing standing behind the output and no route for the person affected.
Vendor Published

Reports carry reasons for every Consider result, and an email address takes reports of inaccurate results. A guarantee, an accuracy commitment or an alternative evidence route for a person turned away is not offered. The product privacy notice says the institution alone decides how to act on a report, which places the loss with the customer, and a person who fails a check is sent to the institution to exercise data rights.

Integration and Deployment
Model Supply Chain Disclosure
BB on Model Supply Chain DisclosureSubstantial partial disclosure, or a chain that is structurally short: an explicit in house build, on premise deployment, per customer instances, or zero retention at the model layer.
Vendor Published

The core models are deep learning models fine tuned on Entrust's own data, and the pretrained models they start from, including the vision language model behind document extraction, are not named. A public subprocessor list covers every party that touches user data, with location and purpose: Amazon Web Services for hosting and processing, Microsoft for speech to text in video checks, data providers including Equifax, Experian, LSEG, ComplyAdvantage and Mastercard, and outsourcing firms such as Concentrix and Teleperformance for human review.

Core Systems and Integration Depth
AA on Core Systems and Integration DepthNamed integrations with the systems of record, core banking, policy administration, custodial or contact center platforms, verifiable in marketplace listings or public API documentation.
Vendor Published

Verification flows into debit card issuance on the issuance infrastructure the firm supplies to bank branches, and integrations are named with Microsoft Entra Verified ID, Entra ID and Okta Workforce Identity. A Google Cloud partnership extends the reach into account recovery and workforce verification.

Deployment Model and Data Residency
BB on Deployment Model and Data ResidencyStated residency commitments or regional hosting options.
Vendor Published

Verification data is hosted on Amazon Web Services in the institution's choice of European Union, Canada or United States instance, and Microsoft's speech service for video checks runs in the matching West Europe, East US or Canada Central region. Support and review staff at Entrust's outsourcing firms reach that data from India, Vietnam and Bulgaria.

Commercial
Commercial Transparency
CC on Commercial TransparencyNo price is published and engagement runs through a demo form, which is the norm in this index.
Vendor Published

Every route is a contact request, with no pricing or basis of charge for verification sold alone or within a wider identity portfolio. Charging per check or per protected customer is left unsaid.

Institution and Segment Coverage
BB on Institution and Segment CoverageNamed segments with dedicated material behind part of the coverage.
Vendor Published

Financial services has its own banking page and use case sequence from onboarding through authentication to card issuance, with named financial customers. Government, travel and gaming sit beside it as other verticals.

Tracked Since Listing

Product updates

Material product, regulatory, evidence and commercial changes at Entrust, each verified against a live source and tagged to the capability axis it bears on. Funding rounds and awards are not product changes and are not logged.

Sep 23, 2026Security / compliance

Entrust IDV iOS SDK 100.15.0 now stores capture videos in a protected on device location and deletes them automatically once they are no longer needed. Hosted capture modules now run in a nonpersistent WebKit data store and SDK network requests no longer write to the on disk URL cache, so no verification session data is left in the host app's container. The release also adds an EntrustIdvTrial module to the Swift package and fixes NFC handling for all NFC capable documents.

Bears on: GLBA and Data Privacy PostureSource
Our read on this update →Tracked since Sep 2026
Head to Head

Compared With

Most editorial comparisons pair two vendors the index assesses as direct competitors for the same buyer. Some pair vendors that are adjacent rather than rival, where the useful question is where one ends and the other begins. Each carries a verdict, the buyer conditions that favor each vendor, and a graded side by side.

Alternatives to Entrust

Vendors in the same categories as Entrust whose profiles look most alike, each with a line on what the product does. Similar is not the same: check that each one does the job you need. No vendor pays for placement.

Complead, known until September 2026 as Sanction Scanner, sells an AML, KYC and fraud platform to banks, payment and electronic money firms, fintechs, insurers, crypto businesses and gaming operators.

Flagright sells a financial crime compliance platform to payment processors, digital banks, banks, credit unions, brokerages, crypto and remittance firms, covering real time transaction…

IDnow sells identity verification, fraud prevention and electronic signatures to banks, lenders, insurers, crypto firms, telecoms and gaming operators from its base in Munich, with offices…

Tookitaki unifies anti money laundering monitoring, fraud prevention, screening, onboarding risk, customer risk scoring and case management in FinCense, a platform for banks, digital banks…

Middesk is a business identity platform that verifies companies rather than people and takes that verification through to a decision.

Alloy is an identity risk orchestration and decisioning platform for banks, credit unions and fintechs.

The index publishes no overall score or ranking. See what we assess and the methodology.

Commercial

Pricing

Vendor-published figures are labeled as such. Figures labeled “Estimated” are derived from third-party sources and have not been confirmed by the vendor.

No pricing data has been verified for this vendor. Pricing information will be published here once confirmed through vendor disclosure or third-party estimation.

Contact us

Found a vendor we missed? Have feedback on the index? We’d love to hear from you.

AI FinTech Index

The AI FinTech Index is an independent index that tracks changes to AI vendors in financial services. It holds 610 vendors across banking, lending, insurance, wealth, capital markets and financial crime compliance, each graded on the same 15 capability axes from public sources. No vendor pays for inclusion, placement, or rating.

Index Status
Last index update
October 20, 2026
The AI FinTech Index is an editorial reference, not a regulatory body. Vendor data is verified against published sources and public regulatory filings. Figures labeled “Estimated” have not been confirmed by the vendor. See the Methodology page for evaluation standards and limitations.
© 2026 AI FinTech Index
3801 N Capital of Texas Hwy, Ste E240 · Austin, TX 78746