Compliance, Surveillance & RegTech
A

Acin

Acin sells operational risk data and AI tools to large banks and other financial institutions. It gathers an institution's risk controls into one structured, digitized library, uses its own AI to assess, rewrite and remove duplicate controls, and maps controls to regulations for traceability.

Its network works on a give to get model. Institutions benchmark their controls against the Acin Index, built from industry data, to see where they match peers, differ or have gaps. Acin says the network holds more than a trillion risk and control data connections.

Barclays, BNP Paribas, Citi, J.P. Morgan, Lloyds Banking Group and Fitch are named as clients and strategic investors. Cube, a regulatory technology company, has acquired Acin. It is based in London.

Last VerifiedOctober 3, 2026
Compare Acin with other vendors
Founded
2018
Headquarters
London, England, United Kingdom
Website
www.acin.com
Categories
compliance-and-surveillance, capital-markets-ai, wealth-and-advisory
Assessment

Capability Axes

Capability grades

15 of 15 axes rated · 6 graded A or B

AI Capability
AI Centrality
AA on AI CentralityThe artificial intelligence is the product. Remove the models and there is nothing left to sell.
Vendor Published

Operational risk lives in policy and control text, which is why language models do the core work here, from assessing control quality to rewriting controls and finding gaps against industry data.

Autonomy and Oversight Model
CC on Autonomy and Oversight ModelAutonomy is claimed and oversight is asserted without a mechanism, or full automation is presented as the entire disclosure. Human in the loop appears as a phrase rather than a described control.
Vendor Published

The tooling rewrites, creates and optimizes controls at scale, and no review or approval step is described before a rewrite replaces the original.

Model Risk Management and Transparency
CC on Model Risk Management and TransparencyTransparency is claimed in general terms with no mechanism a model validator could interrogate.
Vendor Published

The Acin Index and the AI quality scores come with no scoring method, accuracy rate or validation behind them.

Operational and Outcome Evidence
BB on Operational and Outcome EvidenceVendor aggregate claims with real figures, or audited scale disclosures from a publicly listed company.
Vendor Published

Six institutions are named, Barclays and Citi among them, and every one is also a strategic investor. The savings figures are worked examples, such as 5 million pounds a year from removing 1,000 duplicate controls, not results at a client.

AI Safety and Data Stewardship
BB on AI Safety and Data StewardshipA categorical stewardship commitment is published without the retention schedule or the engineering detail behind it.
Vendor Published

Pooled industry data is the product, since the network runs on give to get and every member's data feeds the Acin Index. How contributions are anonymized, and what peers can see, isn't explained, even though the privacy policy reserves the right to share anonymized data.

Regulatory and Compliance
GLBA and Data Privacy Posture
BB on GLBA and Data Privacy PostureA substantive privacy document that reaches the product itself, short of the subprocessor list or the full data handling detail.
Vendor Published

The privacy policy of March 3, 2023 covers Acin Terminal users, not just website visitors, and deletes their data within 12 months of termination, subject to retention of up to six years.

Security Certifications and Trust Center
CC on Security Certifications and Trust CenterA single footer line, or certifications asserted without being enumerated, which is weaker than naming them because it invites an assumption a buyer cannot check.
Vendor Published

A trust center on Drata is linked from the homepage, while the site itself names no certification or audit report.

Regulatory Status and Licensure
BB on Regulatory Status and LicensureThe regulatory position is clearly stated and appropriate to the product, with part of the verification left to the buyer.
Vendor Published

Regulatory mapping links rules to controls for traceability, with Basel standards referenced. As a data and software supplier, Acin names no regulator or registration of its own.

AI Governance and Bias Disclosure
CC on AI Governance and Bias DisclosureResponsible artificial intelligence committed to in policy language with no evaluation behind it, on a product whose bias surface is modest.
Vendor Published

Benchmarking against an industry consensus helps laggards, but a gap the entire peer group shares will look normal. Acin describes no check on that effect.

AI Liability and Recourse
CC on AI Liability and RecourseMechanisms that enable challenge, such as audit trails and source traceability, with nothing standing behind the output and no route for the person affected.
Vendor Published

Controls rewritten or removed on Acin's advice become the institution's defense in an examination, and Acin publishes no guarantee or indemnity if a removed control turns out to matter.

Integration and Deployment
Model Supply Chain Disclosure
CC on Model Supply Chain DisclosureThe architecture is described and no provider is named.
Vendor Published

Proprietary AI and a partnership with Microsoft are as far as disclosure goes. The privacy policy names providers by category only, and no model provider or host appears.

Core Systems and Integration Depth
CC on Core Systems and Integration DepthIntegration claimed through standards or connectors with no system named and nothing to verify.
Vendor Published

Delivery runs through the Acin Terminal, and no GRC, control testing or issue management system is named as a connection.

Deployment Model and Data Residency
CC on Deployment Model and Data ResidencyCloud only with nothing stated, which is the category norm.
Vendor Published

Users' personal information is stored in the United Kingdom, but where client control data is hosted isn't stated.

Commercial
Commercial Transparency
CC on Commercial TransparencyNo price is published and engagement runs through a demo form, which is the norm in this index.
Vendor Published

Membership in the network has no published price, and whether fees scale with controls or entities isn't said.

Institution and Segment Coverage
BB on Institution and Segment CoverageNamed segments with dedicated material behind part of the coverage.
Vendor Published

Major banks are the core membership, with a ratings group in the mix, and the scope runs from control analytics to benchmarking and regulatory mapping.

Head to Head

Compared With

Most editorial comparisons pair two vendors the index assesses as direct competitors for the same buyer. Some pair vendors that are adjacent rather than rival, where the useful question is where one ends and the other begins. Each carries a verdict, the buyer conditions that favor each vendor, and a graded side by side.

Alternatives to Acin

Vendors in the same categories as Acin whose profiles look most alike, each with a line on what the product does. Similar is not the same: check that each one does the job you need. No vendor pays for placement.

Intelligo sells AI due diligence and background checks to asset allocators, private equity, real estate, lending and banking clients.

Aptus.AI converts financial regulation into a machine readable format and sells the result to compliance and legal functions at banks, insurers and other regulated firms.

Exiger assesses risk in the third parties, suppliers and customers an organization depends on.

NuArca Labs sells NuComply, a large language model compliance assistant built for banks and other financial institutions.

Luthor reviews regulated marketing before it goes live and describes itself as an artificial intelligence native compliance firm rather than a pure software vendor.

AscentAI, formerly Ascent Technologies and Ascent RegTech, converts regulatory rulebooks into machine readable obligations mapped to a specific firm's business profile.

The index publishes no overall score or ranking. See what we assess and the methodology.

Commercial

Pricing

Vendor-published figures are labeled as such. Figures labeled “Estimated” are derived from third-party sources and have not been confirmed by the vendor.

No pricing data has been verified for this vendor. Pricing information will be published here once confirmed through vendor disclosure or third-party estimation.

Contact us

Found a vendor we missed? Have feedback on the index? We’d love to hear from you.

AI FinTech Index

The AI FinTech Index is an independent index that tracks changes to AI vendors in financial services. It holds 610 vendors across banking, lending, insurance, wealth, capital markets and financial crime compliance, each graded on the same 15 capability axes from public sources. No vendor pays for inclusion, placement, or rating.

Index Status
Last index update
October 20, 2026
The AI FinTech Index is an editorial reference, not a regulatory body. Vendor data is verified against published sources and public regulatory filings. Figures labeled “Estimated” have not been confirmed by the vendor. See the Methodology page for evaluation standards and limitations.
© 2026 AI FinTech Index
3801 N Capital of Texas Hwy, Ste E240 · Austin, TX 78746