Capital Markets & Research AI
T

ToltIQ

ToltIQ, formerly DiligentIQ, sells AI due diligence software to private markets deal teams. It reads virtual data rooms of thousands of documents and links every finding to its source.

Deal teams turn firm templates into reusable workflows, run bulk queries across hundreds of documents and share knowledge vaults. ToltIQ runs on models from OpenAI, Anthropic, Google and Cohere under zero data retention, in a single tenant setup that keeps US data in the United States and European data in Dublin.

H.I.G. Capital selected ToltIQ for firm wide diligence in March 2026, and it has partnerships with PwC, PitchBook and Intapp. ToltIQ holds SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001 and is based in New York.

Last VerifiedOctober 2, 2026
Compare ToltIQ with other vendors
Founded
—
Headquarters
New York, New York, United States
Website
toltiq.com
Categories
capital-markets-ai, wealth-and-advisory
Assessment

Capability Axes

Capability grades

15 of 15 axes rated · 11 graded A or B

AI Capability
AI Centrality
AA on AI CentralityThe artificial intelligence is the product. Remove the models and there is nothing left to sell.
Vendor Published

Models do the ingesting, categorizing, extraction and drafting that turn a virtual data room's thousands of pages into something a deal team can question. Little survives their removal beyond a document viewer.

Autonomy and Oversight Model
BB on Autonomy and Oversight ModelA written commitment that the models work alongside human judgment, with real review surfaces, short of the full control structure: commonly the threshold at which the system stops or what happens after it is wrong.
Vendor Published

Framed as a co pilot, the platform gives deal teams team visible chats, a live dashboard of deal activity and firm defined workflows that produce editable outputs. Confidence indications on extracted terms, and flags for unparsed documents, are not described.

Model Risk Management and Transparency
BB on Model Risk Management and TransparencyReal transparency mechanisms are published, such as per alert explainability, confidence scoring or split testing, without the validation package or supervisory mapping behind them.
Vendor Published

Every finding links to its source document, each feature has a recommended default model a user can change, and accuracy gains over direct model access are claimed across 14,400 scored responses. Figures, method and error rates behind those responses stay unpublished.

Operational and Outcome Evidence
BB on Operational and Outcome EvidenceVendor aggregate claims with real figures, or audited scale disclosures from a publicly listed company.
Vendor Published

H.I.G. Capital chose the platform for a firm wide diligence deployment in March 2026, PwC formed a strategic relationship in June 2026, and HarbourVest, Fortress and Audax appear among users. No outcome figure attaches to a named firm, and the one testimonial comes from an unnamed holding company.

AI Safety and Data Stewardship
AA on AI Safety and Data StewardshipThe cross client data boundary is answered specifically and falsifiably: commitments like zero training on customer data or per customer model instances.
Vendor Published

Rival bidders can review the same data room on one platform, which makes the boundary decisive, and it is specific: single tenant environments, no training on client data and zero data retention terms with each named model provider.

Regulatory and Compliance
GLBA and Data Privacy Posture
BB on GLBA and Data Privacy PostureA substantive privacy document that reaches the product itself, short of the subprocessor list or the full data handling detail.
Vendor Published

The security page reaches the product, with client data isolated and firms choosing firm wide or private visibility for each deal. A privacy document for the service and a retention period after a deal closes or breaks are nowhere stated.

Security Certifications and Trust Center
BB on Security Certifications and Trust CenterA recognized certification named in the vendor’s own material without the artifact, or with a scope or renewal question the buyer has to raise.
Vendor Published

SOC 2 Type II with no exceptions noted and ISO 27001:2022 certification are stated, with third party penetration testing and a Vanta hosted portal at trust.toltiq.com. Report access, by download or request, is unclear.

Regulatory Status and Licensure
CC on Regulatory Status and LicensureThe regulatory position is unstated. Most vendors in this index are technology suppliers and being unlicensed is the correct posture, so this grade records silence about the posture, not a missing license.
Vendor Published

Limited partners diligence under fiduciary duties, private fund advisers work under rules on the diligence behind a commitment, and every firm on the platform handles material non public information, yet no supervisor, statute or rule is named.

AI Governance and Bias Disclosure
CC on AI Governance and Bias DisclosureResponsible artificial intelligence committed to in policy language with no evaluation behind it, on a product whose bias surface is modest.
Vendor Published

Extraction is likely to work better on conventionally organized data rooms, so a company with thinner or less orthodox documentation may surface more apparent risk simply because the model read it worse. Prompts built from what diligence has historically flagged also carry old assumptions, and neither exposure is addressed.

AI Liability and Recourse
CC on AI Liability and RecourseMechanisms that enable challenge, such as audit trails and source traceability, with nothing standing behind the output and no route for the person affected.
Vendor Published

An identifiable investment professional remains accountable for what reaches a committee, and a deal team can check any extracted term against the original. An extraction found wrong after a deal closes has no published accuracy commitment or correction process behind it.

Integration and Deployment
Model Supply Chain Disclosure
BB on Model Supply Chain DisclosureSubstantial partial disclosure, or a chain that is structurally short: an explicit in house build, on premise deployment, per customer instances, or zero retention at the model layer.
Vendor Published

OpenAI, Anthropic and Google Gemini are among four named model providers, and AWS hosts European data. Subprocessors are not listed, so the full chain behind a data room's documents is not enumerated.

Core Systems and Integration Depth
BB on Core Systems and Integration DepthNamed systems or a documented public API, with the depth or the production evidence left open.
Vendor Published

Partnerships with Intapp for deal execution, PitchBook for private markets data and Deal Engine for sourcing are announced, with an MCP server launched in August 2026. Data room providers are not named as integrations, and developer documentation is not published.

Deployment Model and Data Residency
BB on Deployment Model and Data ResidencyStated residency commitments or regional hosting options.
Vendor Published

US clients' data stays in the United States and European clients' data on dedicated AWS infrastructure in Dublin, where a data center opened in October 2025. A private deployment option does not appear.

Commercial
Commercial Transparency
CC on Commercial TransparencyNo price is published and engagement runs through a demo form, which is the norm in this index.
Vendor Published

Processing is built to keep AI costs forecastable at scale, the variable buyers worry about, yet no price, package or charging basis is published. Whether a firm pays per deal, per seat or per data room is not said.

Institution and Segment Coverage
BB on Institution and Segment CoverageNamed segments with dedicated material behind part of the coverage.
Vendor Published

General partners, limited partners and diligence advisers are served, with the product built around a deal team's data room work. Portfolio monitoring, valuation and fund operations fall outside its diligence scope.

Alternatives to ToltIQ

Vendors in the same categories as ToltIQ whose profiles look most alike, each with a line on what the product does. Similar is not the same: check that each one does the job you need. No vendor pays for placement.

BlueFlame sells AI deal intelligence software to private equity firms, investment banks, private credit lenders, real estate investors, endowments and hedge funds.

Capsa AI sells an AI operating system to private equity firms and other private capital investors.

Finster AI sells a research and agent platform to investment banks, asset managers and private credit teams.

Hebbia analyzes large sets of private documents for asset managers, private equity firms, investment banks, credit investors and law firms.

Needl.ai is a private enterprise AI platform for financial markets, founded in 2019 by Vikram Srinivasan and Kuntal Shah, with engineering in Bengaluru, India and a US entity, Needl Inc.…

F2 builds an agentic platform for private credit funds and commercial banks that covers screening, underwriting and the monitoring of loans after they close.

The index publishes no overall score or ranking. See what we assess and the methodology.

Commercial

Pricing

Vendor-published figures are labeled as such. Figures labeled “Estimated” are derived from third-party sources and have not been confirmed by the vendor.

No pricing data has been verified for this vendor. Pricing information will be published here once confirmed through vendor disclosure or third-party estimation.

Contact us

Found a vendor we missed? Have feedback on the index? We’d love to hear from you.

AI FinTech Index

The AI FinTech Index is an independent index that tracks changes to AI vendors in financial services. It holds 610 vendors across banking, lending, insurance, wealth, capital markets and financial crime compliance, each graded on the same 15 capability axes from public sources. No vendor pays for inclusion, placement, or rating.

Index Status
Last index update
October 20, 2026
The AI FinTech Index is an editorial reference, not a regulatory body. Vendor data is verified against published sources and public regulatory filings. Figures labeled “Estimated” have not been confirmed by the vendor. See the Methodology page for evaluation standards and limitations.
© 2026 AI FinTech Index
3801 N Capital of Texas Hwy, Ste E240 · Austin, TX 78746