AML, KYC & Financial Crime
S

Silent Eight

Silent Eight sells Iris 7, a policy bound agentic AI platform for financial crime compliance that executes sanctions, anti money laundering and customer due diligence decisions, with agents for customer and payment screening, transaction monitoring, adverse media and case management. Each outcome is produced with its applied reasoning and supporting evidence, under the institution's policies and with escalation retained by the institution.

Founded in Singapore in 2015, it has run in live bank environments since Standard Chartered deployed it for sanctions screening in 2018; HSBC, Emirates NBD, Mashreq, First Abu Dhabi Bank and Abu Dhabi Islamic Bank are later named customers, and HSBC and Standard Chartered are also investors. The company reports up to 90 percent improvement in case resolution and up to 99 percent precision.

Last VerifiedOctober 2, 2026
Compare Silent Eight with other vendors
Founded
2015
Headquarters
Singapore
Categories
aml-kyc-financial-crime, compliance-and-surveillance, fraud-and-transaction-risk
Assessment

Capability Axes

Capability grades

15 of 15 axes rated · 7 graded A or B

AI Capability
AI Centrality
AA on AI CentralityThe artificial intelligence is the product. Remove the models and there is nothing left to sell.
Vendor Published

Iris 7 is policy bound agentic AI that executes sanctions, anti money laundering and customer due diligence decisions through named agents for screening, transaction monitoring and adverse media. Without the models, no screening adjudication would be left to sell.

Autonomy and Oversight Model
BB on Autonomy and Oversight ModelA written commitment that the models work alongside human judgment, with real review surfaces, short of the full control structure: commonly the threshold at which the system stops or what happens after it is wrong.
Vendor Published

Agents execute decisions rather than only recommending them, bound by the institution's policies, with ownership and escalation kept by the institution. The point where an agent stops and escalates, and how often closed alerts are sampled, are not published.

Model Risk Management and Transparency
BB on Model Risk Management and TransparencyReal transparency mechanisms are published, such as per alert explainability, confidence scoring or split testing, without the validation package or supervisory mapping behind them.
Vendor Published

Each outcome comes with its applied reasoning and supporting evidence, and quality assurance is a named control. Up to 99 percent precision is stated without a method, test set or recall figure, and model risk management is mentioned with no supervisory instrument named.

Operational and Outcome Evidence
BB on Operational and Outcome EvidenceVendor aggregate claims with real figures, or audited scale disclosures from a publicly listed company.
Vendor Published

HSBC's chief executive, Bill Winters, is quoted on faster and more accurate detection of financial crime risk, and Standard Chartered's sanctions deployment dates to July 2018. Figures such as up to 90 percent better case resolution carry no named customer or method, and both banks are also investors.

AI Safety and Data Stewardship
CC on AI Safety and Data StewardshipGeneral assurances that do not answer the question this axis asks, which is whether one customer’s data trains models serving its competitors. Unbounded cross client learning stated with no boundary grades here too.
Vendor Published

Models were trained on millions of transactions from institutions worldwide and keep learning from investigator feedback, and anonymized datasets are pooled across institutions to counter bias. One bank's adjudications can therefore inform models other banks receive, with no opt out or boundary stated.

Regulatory and Compliance
GLBA and Data Privacy Posture
CC on GLBA and Data Privacy PostureA standard privacy policy that covers the website rather than the service, or silence on a product that touches limited consumer data.
Vendor Published

The privacy policy, updated July 2, 2026, reaches website visitors, job applicants and business contacts, not the screened customers and investigator decisions Iris processes for banks. Subprocessors are named only by category.

Security Certifications and Trust Center
CC on Security Certifications and Trust CenterA single footer line, or certifications asserted without being enumerated, which is weaker than naming them because it invites an assumption a buyer cannot check.
Vendor Published

Security vulnerability disclosure has a footer page, and the privacy policy mentions technical and organizational measures without naming any. SOC 2 reports, ISO certifications and a trust portal do not appear.

Regulatory Status and Licensure
CC on Regulatory Status and LicensureThe regulatory position is unstated. Most vendors in this index are technology suppliers and being unlicensed is the correct posture, so this grade records silence about the posture, not a missing license.
Vendor Published

A 2025 IMDA Spark recognition from Singapore's Infocomm Media Development Authority assesses technical strength and operational maturity, which is not a financial regulatory admission. Supervisors, statutes and instruments the product serves are not named.

AI Governance and Bias Disclosure
CC on AI Governance and Bias DisclosureResponsible artificial intelligence committed to in policy language with no evaluation behind it, on a product whose bias surface is modest.
Vendor Published

Decisions are described as explainable, auditable and defensible, which matters when closing an alert on a named person. Name screening carries documented false positive differences across naming conventions and transliteration, and demographic testing or error analysis by population is unpublished.

AI Liability and Recourse
CC on AI Liability and RecourseMechanisms that enable challenge, such as audit trails and source traceability, with nothing standing behind the output and no route for the person affected.
Vendor Published

Full traceability lets a bank asked by a supervisor why an alert closed produce the conclusion and its logic. Clients reporting no decision quality errors to date describes the past rather than a commitment, and the person screened has no route, largely because the regime forbids telling them.

Integration and Deployment
Model Supply Chain Disclosure
BB on Model Supply Chain DisclosureSubstantial partial disclosure, or a chain that is structurally short: an explicit in house build, on premise deployment, per customer instances, or zero retention at the model layer.
Vendor Published

Watchlist data is not supplied: clients bring their own sanctions and adverse media lists, and the models are presented as Silent Eight's own. Its language model provider for the Iris 7 agents, a subprocessor list and the hosting arrangement are unpublished.

Core Systems and Integration Depth
CC on Core Systems and Integration DepthIntegration claimed through standards or connectors with no system named and nothing to verify.
Vendor Published

Production use inside the screening operations of large banks shows the integration works, and case manager and risk data agents sit within Iris. Screening engines, case management platforms and core systems on either side are not named, and no public API documentation is linked.

Deployment Model and Data Residency
BB on Deployment Model and Data ResidencyStated residency commitments or regional hosting options.
Vendor Published

Cloud, on premises and hybrid deployment are all stated in the FAQ, to meet jurisdictional and regulatory requirements. Hosting provider, region and tenancy model for the hosted service are unnamed.

Commercial
Commercial Transparency
CC on Commercial TransparencyNo price is published and engagement runs through a demo form, which is the norm in this index.
Vendor Published

Price stays unpublished, with a demo request as the way in. Alert volume, agent count and institution size are all candidate bases for charging, and none is confirmed.

Institution and Segment Coverage
BB on Institution and Segment CoverageNamed segments with dedicated material behind part of the coverage.
Vendor Published

Tier 1 banks are the stated audience, with Emirates NBD, Mashreq and First Abu Dhabi Bank among later partners, real reach through a small number of very large institutions. Insurers, smaller banks and fintechs are not addressed on the homepage or case studies page.

Head to Head

Compared With

Most editorial comparisons pair two vendors the index assesses as direct competitors for the same buyer. Some pair vendors that are adjacent rather than rival, where the useful question is where one ends and the other begins. Each carries a verdict, the buyer conditions that favor each vendor, and a graded side by side.

Alternatives to Silent Eight

Vendors in the same categories as Silent Eight whose profiles look most alike, each with a line on what the product does. Similar is not the same: check that each one does the job you need. No vendor pays for placement.

Ripjar sells enterprise screening to institutions that already have a screening system and are overwhelmed by what it produces.

Boost Capital gives banks, microfinance institutions and other financial service providers a white labeled way to onboard customers through chat platforms people already use, including…

Dotfile is a Paris business verification platform founded in 2021 by Vasco Alexandre and Titouan Benoit inside the startup studio Hexa, formerly eFounders, with offices in San Francisco and London.

Quantifind runs risk screening and investigations for financial crime through its Graphyte platform, resolving entities and scoring risk from billions of external sources covering sanctions…

First AML is an Auckland customer due diligence platform founded in 2017, co founded by Bion Behdin who serves as chief revenue officer, and now operating across New Zealand, Australia, the…

Meelo is a French platform that combines identity verification, business verification, solvency assessment, AML screening, bank account validation and document control, so institutions stop…

The index publishes no overall score or ranking. See what we assess and the methodology.

Commercial

Pricing

Vendor-published figures are labeled as such. Figures labeled “Estimated” are derived from third-party sources and have not been confirmed by the vendor.

No pricing data has been verified for this vendor. Pricing information will be published here once confirmed through vendor disclosure or third-party estimation.

Contact us

Found a vendor we missed? Have feedback on the index? We’d love to hear from you.

AI FinTech Index

The AI FinTech Index is an independent index that tracks changes to AI vendors in financial services. It holds 610 vendors across banking, lending, insurance, wealth, capital markets and financial crime compliance, each graded on the same 15 capability axes from public sources. No vendor pays for inclusion, placement, or rating.

Index Status
Last index update
October 20, 2026
The AI FinTech Index is an editorial reference, not a regulatory body. Vendor data is verified against published sources and public regulatory filings. Figures labeled “Estimated” have not been confirmed by the vendor. See the Methodology page for evaluation standards and limitations.
© 2026 AI FinTech Index
3801 N Capital of Texas Hwy, Ste E240 · Austin, TX 78746