Capital Markets & Research AI
Q

QuantumStreet AI

QuantumStreet AI sells AI driven investment strategies and research to asset allocators, investment managers and banks. Clients either license its AI enhanced indexes and portfolios or add its forecasts to their own process.

Through Indices and Custom Portfolios, it designs indexes and portfolios that clients build products on. The QuantumEdge platform lays forecasts, signals and plain language explanations, each with a confidence score, over a client's own research, and is also available through APIs and SDKs.

QuantumStreet AI states more than $8 billion in client designed indexes and portfolios. It runs on IBM watsonx as an IBM partner, and IBM describes it as the institutional division of EquBot. It is based in San Francisco.

Last VerifiedOctober 2, 2026
Compare QuantumStreet AI with other vendors
Founded
2015
Headquarters
San Francisco, California, United States
Categories
capital-markets-ai, wealth-and-advisory
Assessment

Capability Axes

Capability grades

15 of 15 axes rated · 5 graded A or B

AI Capability
AI Centrality
AA on AI CentralityThe artificial intelligence is the product. Remove the models and there is nothing left to sell.
Vendor Published

Deep learning models weighing hundreds of signals across about 50,000 securities generate its index and portfolio methodologies themselves. With the models being the methodology, nothing would survive their removal.

Autonomy and Oversight Model
CC on Autonomy and Oversight ModelAutonomy is claimed and oversight is asserted without a mechanism, or full automation is presented as the entire disclosure. Human in the loop appears as a phrase rather than a described control.
Vendor Published

Models reweight signals continuously and the platform automates strategy design and testing, putting model output where a methodology is created. An approval gate or methodology sign off before a machine designed strategy becomes a live index is not described, though published index rules are fixed once live.

Model Risk Management and Transparency
BB on Model Risk Management and TransparencyReal transparency mechanisms are published, such as per alert explainability, confidence scoring or split testing, without the validation package or supervisory mapping behind them.
Vendor Published

Each one and three month forecast carries a measurable confidence score and each data source a trust score, and clients can backtest a tailored index before launch. A July 2026 release states that 98 percent of its index strategy assets beat their benchmarks in the first half of 2026 and the remaining 2 percent matched them. The figure is weighted by assets, names no benchmark and does not say whether any strategy was closed or left out, so it cannot be checked strategy by strategy.

Operational and Outcome Evidence
BB on Operational and Outcome EvidenceVendor aggregate claims with real figures, or audited scale disclosures from a publicly listed company.
Vendor Published

More than $8 billion is stated as deployed across client indexes and portfolios, against more than 5 billion in IBM's April 2024 case study, so any citation needs its date. Large financial institutions are said to trust it, with none named.

AI Safety and Data Stewardship
CC on AI Safety and Data StewardshipGeneral assurances that do not answer the question this axis asks, which is whether one customer’s data trains models serving its competitors. Unbounded cross client learning stated with no boundary grades here too.
Vendor Published

Where a group entity invests with related models in the same markets, separation from the signals and indices licensees receive matters, and none is described. Sequencing of known index rebalances and walling off of client portfolio data are also left open.

Regulatory and Compliance
GLBA and Data Privacy Posture
CC on GLBA and Data Privacy PostureA standard privacy policy that covers the website rather than the service, or silence on a product that touches limited consumer data.
Vendor Published

Market, fundamental and news data carry little personal information, but a client building portfolios on the platform passes its holdings and intended positioning through the vendor. The privacy policy covers the website and newsletter, and client portfolio data handling, segregation and retention are not addressed.

Security Certifications and Trust Center
CC on Security Certifications and Trust CenterA single footer line, or certifications asserted without being enumerated, which is weaker than naming them because it invites an assumption a buyer cannot check.
Vendor Published

Fiduciary grade explainability is described where security controls would be, and no attestation, certification or trust center is published. IBM's infrastructure assurance belongs to the platform provider, not the vendor.

Regulatory Status and Licensure
CC on Regulatory Status and LicensureThe regulatory position is unstated. Most vendors in this index are technology suppliers and being unlicensed is the correct posture, so this grade records silence about the posture, not a missing license.
Vendor Published

IBM's April 2024 case study calls QuantumStreet the institutional division of EquBot, while QuantumStreet's own site mentions neither EquBot nor any registration. Which entity signs an index license, and how performance presentation and benchmark rules are met, is not stated.

AI Governance and Bias Disclosure
CC on AI Governance and Bias DisclosureResponsible artificial intelligence committed to in policy language with no evaluation behind it, on a product whose bias surface is modest.
Vendor Published

Thematic indices rely on generative AI to decide which companies belong to a theme, steering institutional capital toward some issuers and away from others. Governance of that taxonomy, review of disputed inclusions and issuer recourse are unpublished.

AI Liability and Recourse
CC on AI Liability and RecourseMechanisms that enable challenge, such as audit trails and source traceability, with nothing standing behind the output and no route for the person affected.
Vendor Published

A published index methodology is fixed and checkable, which lets a client challenge a result. Restatement or correction for a miscalculated index is not committed to, and any fiduciary duty in the group attaches to an adviser relationship rather than an index license.

Integration and Deployment
Model Supply Chain Disclosure
BB on Model Supply Chain DisclosureSubstantial partial disclosure, or a chain that is structurally short: an explicit in house build, on premise deployment, per customer instances, or zero retention at the model layer.
Vendor Published

Underneath sits IBM watsonx, and IBM's case study records Watson Discovery and Watson Studio in use before the move to watsonx.ai. Market, news and alternative data suppliers, half the chain for a signal product, are unnamed.

Core Systems and Integration Depth
CC on Core Systems and Integration DepthIntegration claimed through standards or connectors with no system named and nothing to verify.
Vendor Published

Programmatic interfaces, client libraries and SDKs deliver forecasts behind an access request, with documentation kept private. Order management, portfolio management and index calculation systems are not named as connections.

Deployment Model and Data Residency
CC on Deployment Model and Data ResidencyCloud only with nothing stated, which is the category norm.
Third Party Estimated

Software as a service supported in the United States is how IBM's partner directory lists delivery, and the company's own pages give no hosting provider, region or residency commitment. A European or Asian institution feeding in its own portfolio data has no stated location for it.

Commercial
Commercial Transparency
CC on Commercial TransparencyNo price is published and engagement runs through a demo form, which is the norm in this index.
Vendor Published

Licensing fee basis, platform subscription price and API rates are unpublished, with access by demo or request. Index fees are conventionally struck on linked assets, which makes the basis of charge the question that sets total cost.

Institution and Segment Coverage
BB on Institution and Segment CoverageNamed segments with dedicated material behind part of the coverage.
Vendor Published

Asset allocators, investment managers and banks are addressed through two consumption models: a licensed or custom index built with the team, or forecasts and signals overlaid on a client's own process. Material behind each segment is partial.

Head to Head

Compared With

Most editorial comparisons pair two vendors the index assesses as direct competitors for the same buyer. Some pair vendors that are adjacent rather than rival, where the useful question is where one ends and the other begins. Each carries a verdict, the buyer conditions that favor each vendor, and a graded side by side.

Alternatives to QuantumStreet AI

Vendors in the same categories as QuantumStreet AI whose profiles look most alike, each with a line on what the product does. Similar is not the same: check that each one does the job you need. No vendor pays for placement.

Cyndx has ceased operations.

Axyon AI builds deep learning models that rank stocks, sectors, indices and futures by expected relative performance.

Farseer sells an AI monitoring and decision support platform to banks, listed companies and government bodies, mainly in Hong Kong and mainland China.

Hudson Labs, founded in 2019 in Toronto and formerly called Bedrock AI, builds finance specific language models for institutional equity research.

Linvest21 builds AlphaCopilot, an investment platform run by specialized agents including equity analysts, portfolio managers and virtual chief investment officers, sold to investment…

Samaya AI builds research agents for investment banks, sales and trading desks, hedge funds and asset managers.

The index publishes no overall score or ranking. See what we assess and the methodology.

Commercial

Pricing

Vendor-published figures are labeled as such. Figures labeled “Estimated” are derived from third-party sources and have not been confirmed by the vendor.

No pricing data has been verified for this vendor. Pricing information will be published here once confirmed through vendor disclosure or third-party estimation.

Contact us

Found a vendor we missed? Have feedback on the index? We’d love to hear from you.

AI FinTech Index

The AI FinTech Index is an independent index that tracks changes to AI vendors in financial services. It holds 610 vendors across banking, lending, insurance, wealth, capital markets and financial crime compliance, each graded on the same 15 capability axes from public sources. No vendor pays for inclusion, placement, or rating.

Index Status
Last index update
October 20, 2026
The AI FinTech Index is an editorial reference, not a regulatory body. Vendor data is verified against published sources and public regulatory filings. Figures labeled “Estimated” have not been confirmed by the vendor. See the Methodology page for evaluation standards and limitations.
© 2026 AI FinTech Index
3801 N Capital of Texas Hwy, Ste E240 · Austin, TX 78746