Customer & Banking Agents
G

Glia

Glia sells a customer service platform with built in AI to community and regional banks, credit unions and insurers, and counts more than 700 institutions as customers. Glia Banker answers routine calls and chats, CoPilot guides human agents from approved knowledge, and Outreach runs automated calling and text campaigns. Voice, chat, video, messaging and screen sharing share one conversation, so a customer can move from the AI to a person without starting over. Glia guarantees in its contracts that its AI will not present hallucinations to customers, and it charges a fixed fee rather than per seat or minute.

Last VerifiedNovember 3, 2026
Compare Glia with other vendors
Founded
2012
Headquarters
New York
Website
www.glia.com
Categories
customer-banking-agents, insurance-ai
Assessment

Capability Axes

Capability grades

15 of 15 axes rated · 10 graded A or B

AI Capability
AI Centrality
BB on AI CentralityThe models are the engine of a core capability, layered on a product that would still function without them as a rules or workflow system.
Vendor Published

Take the models away and a working omnichannel service platform remains. The models still do substantial work. Glia Banker, the voice and digital assistant, is trained on more than 1,000 banking journeys, and Glia says it can automate up to 80% of inquiries. CoPilot guides human agents from approved knowledge, Analyst reviews calls for coaching and staffing, and Outreach runs AI calling campaigns.

Underneath sits the original asset, one architecture that carries voice, chat, video, messaging and screen sharing without losing context. That is engineering more than modeling, which makes Glia a platform vendor with AI across it.

Autonomy and Oversight Model
AA on Autonomy and Oversight ModelWhat the system runs alone, what constrains it, and how a person checks it are all published: modes, thresholds, sampling or audit controls, and the route a case takes to human review.
Vendor Published

Control sits before the assistant speaks rather than after. The approvals framework gives the institution authority over what its AI agent may say, so oversight is a limit set at design time instead of a review of transcripts. Agentic Workflows, which can freeze cards, unlock accounts and make transfers, set each step to run on its own or to wait for human approval. Handover passes the full context to a human agent, so a customer moves from assistant to person without repeating themselves.

Model Risk Management and Transparency
BB on Model Risk Management and TransparencyReal transparency mechanisms are published, such as per alert explainability, confidence scoring or split testing, without the validation package or supervisory mapping behind them.
Vendor Published

The approvals framework doubles as a model risk control. It keeps every answer within topics the institution has approved, and Glia says the assistant never improvises answers in real time. A reviewer can inspect that response space in advance rather than sampling outputs afterward. The evidence layer is thinner. Glia gives no recognition accuracy, no false resolution rate for calls the assistant closed that should have escalated, and no model documentation a bank's validators could use. The one automation figure comes from a customer, Busey Bank, which automates 61% of its calls.

Operational and Outcome Evidence
AA on Operational and Outcome EvidenceNamed customers with hard performance figures and enough method to test them.
Vendor Published

Outcomes are tied to named institutions. During an acquisition that grew its customer base 25%, Busey Bank saw agent call volume rise only 5% and wrap up time halve, and it now automates 61% of calls. Heritage Federal Credit Union reached 151% of its annual loan target, and Unitus Community Credit Union cut its average speed of answer by 60 seconds. Executives at Busey, Heritage, Service 1st and Heartland are quoted by name and title. Glia claims more than 700 institutions and more than 10 billion interactions.

AI Safety and Data Stewardship
BB on AI Safety and Data StewardshipA categorical stewardship commitment is published without the retention schedule or the engineering detail behind it.
Vendor Published

A design that keeps the assistant to approved content backs the guarantee against hallucinations and prompt injections, which turns a generative risk into a contract term. Learning is described per institution. Glia says each institution gets its own improving knowledge base, and institutions choose which agents' interactions train it. Whether anything is pooled across institutions is not addressed. The terms leave data ownership with the customer, but grant Glia a perpetual license to anonymized data and let it use usage data to improve the platform. No retention periods are published.

Regulatory and Compliance
GLBA and Data Privacy Posture
CC on GLBA and Data Privacy PostureA standard privacy policy that covers the website rather than the service, or silence on a product that touches limited consumer data.
Vendor Published

Screen sharing and co browsing let a representative watch a customer move through online banking in real time. That is useful for guiding someone through an application, and it is the most intrusive thing in the product. Glia's pages do not say what a representative can see, how account numbers and balances are masked on screen, or how consent is captured. Its privacy notice, updated 28 October 2026, covers only data Glia controls and excludes the client data it processes. No data processing agreement, subprocessor list or retention schedule is published.

Security Certifications and Trust Center
BB on Security Certifications and Trust CenterA recognized certification named in the vendor’s own material without the artifact, or with a scope or renewal question the buyer has to raise.
Vendor Published

SOC 2 Type II and PCI DSS appear on both the security page and the trust center, and the voice page describes PCI Level 1 controls backed by a direct PCI DSS report. The trust center also cites HIPAA controls and regular penetration testing, and holds compliance, security and insurance documents. Neither page gives an audit period or the scope of each report. Glia holds no ISO 27001 of its own and points to AWS's reports for the hosting layer. Data is encrypted in transit and at rest, and masking of personal data is listed as a control.

Regulatory Status and Licensure
CC on Regulatory Status and LicensureThe regulatory position is unstated. Most vendors in this index are technology suppliers and being unlicensed is the correct posture, so this grade records silence about the posture, not a missing license.
Vendor Published

Glia supplies technology and holds no license, the expected posture for a supplier. Its pages name no regulator and do not say which rules the product is built to meet. The exposure to watch is outbound. Glia Outreach, launched in June 2026, places automated voice calls and texts about renewals, loan offers and payments, including reminders after a missed payment.

Automated calls with an artificial voice fall under telephone consumer protection rules carrying per contact statutory damages, and missed payment reminders can bring in debt collection rules. Glia's outreach pages say nothing about consent capture, do not call scrubbing, opt out handling or calling windows, and that exposure lands on the institution.

AI Governance and Bias Disclosure
CC on AI Governance and Bias DisclosureResponsible artificial intelligence committed to in policy language with no evaluation behind it, on a product whose bias surface is modest.
Vendor Published

Voice is where fairness bites in this product. Speech recognition accuracy varies by accent, regional dialect and speech impairment, and a member the assistant cannot understand is pushed to wait or gives up. That falls hardest on the community banking populations Glia serves. Glia publishes a web accessibility statement to WCAG 2.1 AA, tested with screen readers and users with disabilities, and supports Spanish across voice and chat.

It publishes no recognition accuracy by speaker group, no containment rate by accent and no fallback design for repeated recognition failures. Its trust center lists one AI policy document, and its public pages describe no process for governing its models.

AI Liability and Recourse
AA on AI Liability and RecourseA commitment that makes the vendor answerable when the AI is wrong: a guarantee, or an indemnity running toward the customer.
Vendor Published

Glia contractually guarantees that hallucinations will not be presented to customers or members and that prompt injection attacks will have no effect. Announced in March 2026, the guarantee sits in section 2.5 of Glia's master agreement, according to its own blog. That moves generative failure from a disclaimer the customer absorbs to a term the vendor answers for. The remedies, exclusions and conditions are not public, and the agreement versions listed on Glia's site require a password.

Its public terms of service disclaim results and cap liability at 12 months of fees. The guarantee covers what the assistant says, not how a member who was misrouted or misunderstood gets it put right.

Integration and Deployment
Model Supply Chain Disclosure
CC on Model Supply Chain DisclosureThe architecture is described and no provider is named.
Vendor Published

AWS is the only host Glia names. Two of its own case studies, for Busey Bank and Service 1st Federal Credit Union, name Amazon Transcribe for speech recognition and Amazon Bedrock for the AI layer. No page says which models run on Bedrock, and the product pages name no model at all. There is no public subprocessor list, so a buyer cannot see whether recordings and screen sessions reach any other processor. For a product sold with a guarantee against hallucinations, the guarantee names no model it covers.

Core Systems and Integration Depth
AA on Core Systems and Integration DepthNamed integrations with the systems of record, core banking, policy administration, custodial or contact center platforms, verifiable in marketplace listings or public API documentation.
Vendor Published

The platform adds to an institution's stack rather than replacing it, which is what lets a small institution adopt it. More than 100 prebuilt integrations are listed, with cores such as Jack Henry Symitar, Corelation and Fiserv DNA, and digital banking platforms such as Alkami and Candescent. Q2 certifies Glia as a strategic reseller. The voice assistant is also sold on its own to run inside an institution's existing cloud contact center, though no contact center vendor is named. Developer documentation sits behind a login.

Deployment Model and Data Residency
CC on Deployment Model and Data ResidencyCloud only with nothing stated, which is the category norm.
Vendor Published

Delivery is software as a service, hosted only on AWS across six AWS zones. No region is named and no data residency option is offered. That matters because the platform holds recorded and transcribed conversations, screen sharing sessions and interaction histories tied to accounts. Where recordings are stored, and for how long, is not stated. Glia claims 99.9999% uptime with no planned downtime.

Commercial
Commercial Transparency
BB on Commercial TransparencyA published plan ladder, billing dimensions, or a stated commitment such as no fees, so a buyer can size the cost before making contact.
Vendor Published

Rates are not published, but the pricing model is. Contact center software usually meters seats and voice minutes, so cost rises exactly when an institution uses it more. Glia's pricing page, branded Priceless Pricing, sets $0 per minute, per seat and per token, with one fixed monthly fee and tiers set by an institution's needs rather than its usage. That tells a buyer the shape of the commitment before any negotiation. The fee itself is not published, and neither is how tiers are banded by institution size.

Institution and Segment Coverage
AA on Institution and Segment CoverageThe financial segments served are named and each carries its own maintained material, whether the coverage is broad or deliberately narrow.
Vendor Published

Community banks, regional banks, credit unions and insurers each get their own material, and the credit union pages speak of members and name the cores credit unions run. Glia claims more than 700 institutions, mostly in North America. Insurance customers include Experian Insurance Services and Celina. Channels cover voice, chat, video, messaging and screen sharing, and the product now reaches branch staff, business banking prospecting and outbound campaigns.

Tracked Since Listing

Product updates

Material product, regulatory, evidence and commercial changes at Glia, each verified against a live source and tagged to the capability axis it bears on. Funding rounds and awards are not product changes and are not logged.

Oct 25, 2026Performance evidencePartially verified

Glia's virtual assistant at University of Kentucky Credit Union, named Kat, now handles about 58 to 60% of calls, according to the credit union's AVP of Member Experience in a CUbroadcast interview. He reported a 47% containment rate, compared with 5% on the legacy contact center system Glia replaced. He also cited a 13% increase in referrals after staff were reallocated, with longer handle times as staff spent more time on member issues.

Bears on: Operational and Outcome EvidenceSource
Sep 23, 2026Product / capability

Glia launched Glia Relationship Management, a built in AI CRM that joins voice, digital and branch interaction history with core banking data such as balances, transactions, products and loans in one customer record. AI updates the record after every interaction, creates records for unmatched callers and chats, and puts a customer summary on the agent's screen when an interaction starts. The same release adds Glia Branch, which captures in person conversations and desktop activity for branch staff, feeds them into the same record, and gives staff real time AI guidance and governed agentic workflows.

Bears on: Core Systems and Integration DepthSource
Our read on these updates →Tracked since Sep 2026
Head to Head

Compared With

Most editorial comparisons pair two vendors the index assesses as direct competitors for the same buyer. Some pair vendors that are adjacent rather than rival, where the useful question is where one ends and the other begins. Each carries a verdict, the buyer conditions that favor each vendor, and a graded side by side.

Alternatives to Glia

Vendors in the same categories as Glia whose profiles look most alike, each with a line on what the product does. Similar is not the same: check that each one does the job you need. No vendor pays for placement.

eGain supplies the governed knowledge layer that frontline banking staff and AI assistants both answer from, unifying policies, procedures, product information and expertise into a single…

interface.ai builds voice and chat AI agents for credit unions and community banks, and has more than 100 institutions live.

Formerly Kasisto, Backbase Conversational Banking is the chat and voice agent product Backbase sells to banks.

Domu AI runs generative AI agents that conduct financial servicing conversations across voice, SMS and email for banks, fintechs, buy now pay later providers, insurers, loan servicers and…

Eltropy runs a unified conversations platform for community financial institutions, carrying text, voice, video, chat, co-browsing and automation across the full member lifecycle from…

Gradient Labs builds Otto, an autonomous customer operations agent for regulated financial services, which does not deflect to a help center but reasons through a query and takes the…

The index publishes no overall score or ranking. See what we assess and the methodology.

Commercial

Pricing

Vendor-published figures are labeled as such. Figures labeled “Estimated” are derived from third-party sources and have not been confirmed by the vendor.

Entry Price Pricing Basis Data Protection Terms Implementation Source
Not published as a figure. One fixed monthly fee, with $0 per minute, $0 per seat and $0 per token.
A single fixed price per institution, billed as a predictable monthly fee. Tiers follow the institution's needs rather than minutes, transcripts or agents, and Glia does not publish how tiers are banded by size. Not tiered on the pricing page. No implementation fee is published. Vendor Published

Taken from Glia's pricing page, branded Priceless Pricing, and the pricing answers in its credit union FAQ. Glia publishes the pricing model, not the fee.

Contact us

Found a vendor we missed? Have feedback on the index? We’d love to hear from you.

AI FinTech Index

The AI FinTech Index is an independent index that tracks changes to AI vendors in financial services. It holds 610 vendors across banking, lending, insurance, wealth, capital markets and financial crime compliance, each graded on the same 15 capability axes from public sources. No vendor pays for inclusion, placement, or rating.

Index Status
Last index update
November 5, 2026
The AI FinTech Index is an editorial reference, not a regulatory body. Vendor data is verified against published sources and public regulatory filings. Figures labeled “Estimated” have not been confirmed by the vendor. See the Methodology page for evaluation standards and limitations.
© 2026 AI FinTech Index
3801 N Capital of Texas Hwy, Ste E240 · Austin, TX 78746