Fraud Detection & Transaction Risk
C

Coris

Coris supplies merchant risk infrastructure to the parties that underwrite merchants rather than to merchants themselves, covering software platforms with embedded payments, independent sales organizations, payment facilitators, acquiring and sponsor banks, marketplaces and lenders. Proprietary models automate onboarding and underwriting, transaction monitoring watches merchant payments in real time, and AI agents decide alerts, pause payouts and close routine cases with full audit trails while edge cases escalate to analysts.

It integrates with Stripe Connect, Adyen for Platforms, TSYS and Fiserv and draws on outside data including Mastercard's MATCH database, Emailage, ScamAdviser, PACER and Creditsafe. Coris reports more than 1.5 million merchants and more than $50 billion of volume monitored, and names customers including Weave, Tekmetric, Zift, Kajabi and Ignition.

Last VerifiedOctober 2, 2026
Compare Coris with other vendors
Founded
2022
Headquarters
Palo Alto, California, United States
Website
www.coris.ai
Categories
fraud-and-transaction-risk, aml-kyc-financial-crime, credit-decisioning
Assessment

Capability Axes

Capability grades

15 of 15 axes rated · 8 graded A or B

AI Capability
AI Centrality
AA on AI CentralityThe artificial intelligence is the product. Remove the models and there is nothing left to sell.
Vendor Published

Proprietary risk models score merchants, agents decide alerts and AI assistants research merchants and summarize investigations so analysts decide in minutes. A merchant database with manual review queues, the operation being replaced, is what would be left.

Autonomy and Oversight Model
BB on Autonomy and Oversight ModelA written commitment that the models work alongside human judgment, with real review surfaces, short of the full control structure: commonly the threshold at which the system stops or what happens after it is wrong.
Vendor Published

Agents decide alerts, pause payouts and resolve routine cases with a person in the loop and escalation for edge cases. What separates routine from edge, the confidence that triggers escalation and how quickly a paused merchant reaches a person are not published.

Model Risk Management and Transparency
CC on Model Risk Management and TransparencyTransparency is claimed in general terms with no mechanism a model validator could interrogate.
Vendor Published

Review time down 75 to 80 percent measures work removed, not how many removed reviews would have changed an outcome. Precision, missed fraud and a false positive rate are all unpublished, though the platform both approves merchants and stops their money.

Operational and Outcome Evidence
AA on Operational and Outcome EvidenceNamed customers with hard performance figures and enough method to test them.
Vendor Published

Weave cut daily reviews by 89 percent, Tekmetric reduced manual risk reviews by 70 percent and Zift cut review effort by 30 percent, each named with executives quoted. The figures measure review effort rather than fraud caught or merchants wrongly declined, with no baseline period.

AI Safety and Data Stewardship
CC on AI Safety and Data StewardshipGeneral assurances that do not answer the question this axis asks, which is whether one customer’s data trains models serving its competitors. Unbounded cross client learning stated with no boundary grades here too.
Vendor Published

Many merchants hold accounts with several platforms, so a risk signal raised at one payment facilitator could follow a merchant to the next. Insights from deidentified usage data may go to third parties under the terms, a permission rather than a boundary, and training is not addressed.

Regulatory and Compliance
GLBA and Data Privacy Posture
BB on GLBA and Data Privacy PostureA substantive privacy document that reaches the product itself, short of the subprocessor list or the full data handling detail.
Vendor Published

Merchant and business information processed through the platform is Customer Data under a privacy policy updated August 20, 2026, with Coris as processor and individual requests routed to the customer. Retention runs as long as needed without periods, and subprocessors are not named.

Security Certifications and Trust Center
BB on Security Certifications and Trust CenterA recognized certification named in the vendor’s own material without the artifact, or with a scope or renewal question the buyer has to raise.
Vendor Published

SOC 2 Type II compliance is stated, and a trust center on Vanta is linked. Its audit period is not given.

Regulatory Status and Licensure
CC on Regulatory Status and LicensureThe regulatory position is unstated. Most vendors in this index are technology suppliers and being unlicensed is the correct posture, so this grade records silence about the posture, not a missing license.
Vendor Published

Compliance violations are said to be detected without naming which, and no supervisor, statute or instrument appears. Sponsor banks, a named buyer type, carry supervisory duties for overseeing the platforms they sponsor, the very risk this product manages.

AI Governance and Bias Disclosure
CC on AI Governance and Bias DisclosureResponsible artificial intelligence committed to in policy language with no evaluation behind it, on a product whose bias surface is modest.
Vendor Published

Paused or declined merchants are often small businesses whose cash flow stops that day, and thin digital footprints produce weaker profiles for new, offline heavy or foreign firms. Common name false positives affect impersonation detection, and error analysis by merchant type or geography is unpublished.

AI Liability and Recourse
CC on AI Liability and RecourseMechanisms that enable challenge, such as audit trails and source traceability, with nothing standing behind the output and no route for the person affected.
Vendor Published

Full audit trails on agent actions let a platform reconstruct and defend why a payout was paused. Terms updated April 11, 2024 provide the service as is with no accuracy warranty and cap liability at twelve months of fees, and the merchant whose money stops has no described route to contest it.

Integration and Deployment
Model Supply Chain Disclosure
BB on Model Supply Chain DisclosureSubstantial partial disclosure, or a chain that is structurally short: an explicit in house build, on premise deployment, per customer instances, or zero retention at the model layer.
Vendor Published

Mastercard's terminated merchant database, Emailage and ScamAdviser are named outside sources alongside proprietary models. Language models behind the agents, and a subprocessor list, are not identified.

Core Systems and Integration Depth
AA on Core Systems and Integration DepthNamed integrations with the systems of record, core banking, policy administration, custodial or contact center platforms, verifiable in marketplace listings or public API documentation.
Vendor Published

Stripe Connect, Adyen for Platforms and TSYS are named on the processing side, with Salesforce and Zendesk for cases and Snowflake as a warehouse, each with a stated function. Developer documentation sits behind a login at docs.coris.ai.

Deployment Model and Data Residency
CC on Deployment Model and Data ResidencyCloud only with nothing stated, which is the category norm.
Vendor Published

Processing happens in the United States and other locations around the world, per the privacy policy, with no hosting provider, region or residency commitment named. Banks overseeing third party processing will want that location documented.

Commercial
Commercial Transparency
CC on Commercial TransparencyNo price is published and engagement runs through a demo form, which is the norm in this index.
Vendor Published

A demonstration is the route to terms, and no price is published. Setup is handled by the company and rules are configured by its own specialists under a managed risk offering, while the charging basis goes unstated.

Institution and Segment Coverage
BB on Institution and Segment CoverageNamed segments with dedicated material behind part of the coverage.
Vendor Published

Payment facilitators, sponsor banks and marketplaces are among eight named buyer types that own merchant risk directly, with coverage from onboarding through monitoring to disputes. Everything serves the one function of merchant risk, and material behind each buyer type is uneven.

Alternatives to Coris

Vendors in the same categories as Coris whose profiles look most alike, each with a line on what the product does. Similar is not the same: check that each one does the job you need. No vendor pays for placement.

Incognia answers the identity question with geography.

Ravelin Technology is a London fraud prevention and payments company founded in 2015 by Martin Sweeney and Leonard Austin, who built it after encountering the problem as merchants at the…

Signifyd sells commerce protection for ecommerce under a financial guarantee, and it sells to two buyer types rather than one.

BioCatch analyzes how a person physically and cognitively interacts with online and mobile banking, covering typing cadence, navigation patterns, hesitation and signs of duress, and turns…

Kount 360 is the payment fraud and digital identity platform Equifax sells as Payments Fraud on Kount 360, alongside Authorized Payment Protection, Chargeback Prevention and Chargeback Recovery.

ThreatMark builds a behavioral baseline for each banking customer and watches for departures from it, profiling how a person physically uses a device, keystroke rhythm, navigation habit…

The index publishes no overall score or ranking. See what we assess and the methodology.

Commercial

Pricing

Vendor-published figures are labeled as such. Figures labeled “Estimated” are derived from third-party sources and have not been confirmed by the vendor.

No pricing data has been verified for this vendor. Pricing information will be published here once confirmed through vendor disclosure or third-party estimation.

Contact us

Found a vendor we missed? Have feedback on the index? We’d love to hear from you.

AI FinTech Index

The AI FinTech Index is an independent index that tracks changes to AI vendors in financial services. It holds 610 vendors across banking, lending, insurance, wealth, capital markets and financial crime compliance, each graded on the same 15 capability axes from public sources. No vendor pays for inclusion, placement, or rating.

Index Status
Last index update
October 20, 2026
The AI FinTech Index is an editorial reference, not a regulatory body. Vendor data is verified against published sources and public regulatory filings. Figures labeled “Estimated” have not been confirmed by the vendor. See the Methodology page for evaluation standards and limitations.
© 2026 AI FinTech Index
3801 N Capital of Texas Hwy, Ste E240 · Austin, TX 78746