Fraud Detection & Transaction Risk
C

ClearSale

ClearSale is an ecommerce fraud prevention business founded in Brazil around 2001. Formerly listed on the B3 exchange as CLSA3, it was acquired by Experian on 1 April 2025. Since then it has continued to sell under its own name and describe itself as an Experian company, with its Brazilian operation running through Serasa Experian. Its position among guarantee sellers is structurally different: it pairs models with people at scale. Every transaction is scored by AI models, and every flagged transaction is then reviewed by a human fraud analyst rather than declined automatically.

The company operates a stated 2,000 or more specialist analysts covering 160 or more countries around the clock. Approved orders carry a chargeback guarantee covering the full cost, a product the company claims to have originated. Alongside it sit Chargeback Protection delivered through ChargebackOps, acquired in January 2022, and Account Protection for identity and abuse. Brand Protection covers phishing and threat monitoring, and an AI Agents Portal exposes the platform to machine readable commerce. The company reports more than $5 trillion in transactions analyzed, a 99 percent accuracy service level and reductions in fraud and chargebacks of up to 95 percent.

It publishes an actual entry price, with Growth plans starting at $250 a month on usage based pricing and no upfront or setup fees, and a custom tier above 50,000 orders a month. Eighteen or more native integrations are named, including Shopify, Magento, BigCommerce and WooCommerce, along with VTEX, Salesforce Commerce Cloud, Oracle Commerce, PrestaShop and Shift4Shop. Named customers include Motorola, Samsonite, Victoria's Secret, AutoZone and Office Depot, as well as Bloomberg, SSENSE, Azul and Dafiti.

Last VerifiedAugust 24, 2026
Compare ClearSale with other vendors
Founded
2001
Headquarters
Miami, Florida, United States
Website
www.clear.sale
Categories
fraud-and-transaction-risk, payments-intelligence
Assessment

Capability Axes

Capability grades

15 of 15 axes rated · 7 graded A or B

AI Capability
AI Centrality
BB on AI CentralityThe models are the engine of a core capability, layered on a product that would still function without them as a rules or workflow system.
Vendor Published

Models score every order, but the differentiator the company sells is a review layer of more than 2,000 analysts drawing on twenty five years of fraud data. Without the models that operation would be slower and costlier and would still function.

Autonomy and Oversight Model
BB on Autonomy and Oversight ModelA written commitment that the models work alongside human judgment, with real review surfaces, short of the full control structure: commonly the threshold at which the system stops or what happens after it is wrong.
Vendor Published

A flagged order reaches a human analyst before any refusal, under a stated policy of never declining automatically, which puts a person ahead of the adverse decision rather than after it. Merchants do not manage fraud rules themselves, and no review turnaround, analyst authority or overturn rate is published.

Model Risk Management and Transparency
BB on Model Risk Management and TransparencyReal transparency mechanisms are published, such as per alert explainability, confidence scoring or split testing, without the validation package or supervisory mapping behind them.
Vendor Published

A 99 percent accuracy service level makes performance a contractual term a customer can hold the vendor to, which few fraud vendors offer. No methodology, denominator or period accompanies the figure, and no validation report or false positive rate stands beside it.

Operational and Outcome Evidence
AA on Operational and Outcome EvidenceNamed customers with hard performance figures and enough method to test them.
Vendor Published

Bloom reached a 99.8 percent approval rate, Motorola recovers $2.4 million a year from false declines and Samsonite holds chargebacks below 0.1 percent across fifteen countries, all named with figures. The customer count runs from 5,000 to 6,000 to more than 100,000 across three sources, a jump left unexplained.

AI Safety and Data Stewardship
CC on AI Safety and Data StewardshipGeneral assurances that do not answer the question this axis asks, which is whether one customer’s data trains models serving its competitors. Unbounded cross client learning stated with no boundary grades here too.
Vendor Published

Merchants' order flow builds a shared fraud asset, and nothing says whether a merchant can decline to contribute or what happens to its data on exit. Under Experian ownership, with Brazil running through a credit bureau, whether merchant transaction data can flow into bureau products is unaddressed.

Regulatory and Compliance
GLBA and Data Privacy Posture
CC on GLBA and Data Privacy PostureA standard privacy policy that covers the website rather than the service, or silence on a product that touches limited consumer data.
Vendor Published

A GDPR badge is the only privacy regime named, and no data processing addendum, transfer mechanism or subprocessor list is public. Flagged orders put named consumer records in front of human analysts, and nothing describes what they see or how that access is logged and retained.

Security Certifications and Trust Center
CC on Security Certifications and Trust CenterA single footer line, or certifications asserted without being enumerated, which is weaker than naming them because it invites an assumption a buyer cannot check.
Vendor Published

Claims of PCI DSS compliance and of following ISO 27001 guidance stop short of certification, with no compliance level, attestation of compliance or registrar named. Home page badges for global compliance and secure design carry no artifact, and no SOC report or trust center appears.

Regulatory Status and Licensure
CC on Regulatory Status and LicensureThe regulatory position is unstated. Most vendors in this index are technology suppliers and being unlicensed is the correct posture, so this grade records silence about the posture, not a missing license.
Vendor Published

Listed on Brazil's B3 exchange until Experian took it private on April 1, 2025, the company has since shed the audited disclosure that listing required, at an undisclosed price. No regulator appears as a counterparty, and no payments directive or transaction risk analysis regime is claimed.

AI Governance and Bias Disclosure
CC on AI Governance and Bias DisclosureResponsible artificial intelligence committed to in policy language with no evaluation behind it, on a product whose bias surface is modest.
Vendor Published

Human analysts make the final call on flagged orders, so reviewer bias sits beside model bias, yet nothing documents review criteria, analyst calibration or consistency between reviewers. A 2022 initiative on inclusive fraud terminology changed the field's language rather than the models' behavior.

AI Liability and Recourse
BB on AI Liability and RecourseA published falsifiable commitment such as an accuracy figure with its method, or a real correction route for the affected person, such as step up verification instead of silent denial.
Vendor Published

The chargeback guarantee covers the full cost of a fraud chargeback on any order the vendor approved, and dispute management extends to handling disputes end to end. A shopper refused was refused by a person who read the case, yet nothing published gives that shopper notice, the evidence or an appeal route.

Integration and Deployment
Model Supply Chain Disclosure
CC on Model Supply Chain DisclosureThe architecture is described and no provider is named.
Vendor Published

Every external input is undisclosed, from data suppliers to cloud hosting and model providers. Experian, one of the large consumer data businesses, now owns the company, and whether its bureau data feeds the fraud models is disclosed nowhere.

Core Systems and Integration Depth
BB on Core Systems and Integration DepthNamed systems or a documented public API, with the depth or the production evidence left open.
Vendor Published

More than eighteen native integrations include Shopify, Magento and BigCommerce, with a REST interface, developer documentation and one click installs that put most teams live within days. No payment gateway or acquirer connector is named, a gap for a vendor whose core product is a chargeback guarantee.

Deployment Model and Data Residency
CC on Deployment Model and Data ResidencyCloud only with nothing stated, which is the category norm.
Vendor Published

Hosted plugins and an interface are the only delivery, with no cloud provider, region or country of processing named across an explicitly multi jurisdiction operation. Analysts reading flagged consumer orders work from undisclosed locations, so a European or Latin American merchant cannot complete its own transfer assessment.

Commercial
Commercial Transparency
BB on Commercial TransparencyA published plan ladder, billing dimensions, or a stated commitment such as no fees, so a buyer can size the cost before making contact.
Vendor Published

Growth plans with the chargeback guarantee start at $250 a month with no setup fees, priced on transaction volume and risk, and a second tier begins above 50,000 orders a month. A buyer learns the floor, metering basis and tier boundary before contact, but never the rate that applies at its own volume.

Institution and Segment Coverage
CC on Institution and Segment CoverageSegments claimed broadly, banks, fintechs, credit unions, without evidence any of them has its own maintained surface.
Vendor Published

Online merchants are the only buyer type, served from startup to enterprise across verticals from electronics to marine and robotics. Reach across more than 160 countries, with a Brazilian operation through Serasa Experian and a Spanish language Latin American presence, gives regional depth without widening the buyer.

Alternatives to ClearSale

Vendors in the same categories as ClearSale whose profiles look most alike, each with a line on what the product does. Similar is not the same: check that each one does the job you need. No vendor pays for placement.

NoFraud sells full service ecommerce fraud screening to small and mid sized merchants, with a Shopify centered distribution model and commercial terms a merchant can test without paying.

Riskified is an ecommerce fraud and risk intelligence company founded in 2013 by chief executive Eido Gal and his co-founder, incorporated in Israel as Riskified Ltd. and listed on the New…

Accertify is an enterprise fraud prevention and payments company based in Itasca, Illinois, and led by president Mark Michelon.

Fraudio is an Amsterdam company founded in 2019 by João Moura and Nathan Trousdell, both from the payments industry, selling fraud and financial crime detection to the payment chain rather…

Sift, formerly Sift Science, sells fraud decisioning to business to consumer digital companies.

Incandor builds behavioral intelligence infrastructure for banks, fintechs, neobanks and digital banks, on the argument that institutions verify identity at account creation but have no…

The index publishes no overall score or ranking. See what we assess and the methodology.

Commercial

Pricing

Vendor-published figures are labeled as such. Figures labeled “Estimated” are derived from third-party sources and have not been confirmed by the vendor.

Entry Price Pricing Basis Data Protection Terms Implementation Source
Growth plans with Chargeback Guarantee published as starting as low as $250 a month, on usage based pricing with no upfront or setup fees. Rate at any given volume is not published.
$250 baseline
Usage based, scaling on monthly transaction volume and risk profile, across two published tiers. The Growth plan starts at $250 a month and includes chargeback protection on approved orders rather than charging for it separately. A custom tier serves merchants processing more than 50,000 orders a month. It adds advanced reporting and controls, custom integrations and service level guarantees, along with single sign on and volume based discounts. Because the vendor carries the full cost of a fraud chargeback on any order it approves, the rate at any given volume is an underwriting output against that merchant's loss profile rather than a list price. That is why the published floor coexists with a custom quote for everyone above it. The structure is deliberately aimed at smaller merchants than enterprise focused competitors serve, and the published entry point is the mechanism for reaching them. No data processing addendum or subprocessor list is published. A privacy policy is published and GDPR compliance is asserted as a home page badge, with the Brazilian operation necessarily falling under that country's regime through Serasa Experian. No other regime is named specifically, and no supervisory authority, retention schedule or transfer mechanism appears. Security terms are weaker than the pricing terms. The company states it is PCI DSS compliant and follows ISO 27001 best practices without claiming certification under either. It names no compliance level, attestation or registrar, and publishes no SOC report or trust center. A merchant gets a published price before contact and gets data protection and assurance terms only through diligence. None, stated explicitly rather than left silent. The pricing section states no upfront fees and the closing call to action states no setup fees, and onboarding is described as fast with guided setup included. That claim is supported by the delivery model. More than eighteen native integrations ship as one click installs or plugins for the major commerce platforms, and most teams are stated to be live within days, so a typical merchant needs no engineering project to deploy. The custom tier adds custom integrations and dedicated fraud analyst teams without a stated fee for either. Support is described as included at both tiers. No professional services rate, engagement minimum or overage charge is published. Vendor Published

An actual figure is published, and a published floor is easy to over read, so precision matters. Before contact a buyer learns the entry point of $250 a month and the metering basis of monthly transaction volume and risk profile. The buyer also learns that no upfront or setup fee applies and that chargeback protection is included in the Growth plan rather than sold as an extra. The volume threshold at which the custom tier begins is published, along with the five things that tier adds.

What a buyer still cannot learn is its own cost. The rate that applies at a given volume, vertical and risk profile is never published, and every route ends at a custom quote with a stated 24 hour response. The $250 figure is a floor attached to the smallest merchants and says little about mid market or enterprise cost. That cost will be set by an underwriting assessment of the merchant's chargeback exposure, since the vendor carries the loss on approved orders. A third party quoting a ClearSale rate derived from that floor would be misleading rather than merely stale.

Contact us

Found a vendor we missed? Have feedback on the index? We’d love to hear from you.

AI FinTech Index

The AI FinTech Index is an independent index that tracks changes to AI vendors in financial services. It holds 610 vendors across banking, lending, insurance, wealth, capital markets and financial crime compliance, each graded on the same 15 capability axes from public sources. No vendor pays for inclusion, placement, or rating.

Index Status
Last index update
October 20, 2026
The AI FinTech Index is an editorial reference, not a regulatory body. Vendor data is verified against published sources and public regulatory filings. Figures labeled “Estimated” have not been confirmed by the vendor. See the Methodology page for evaluation standards and limitations.
© 2026 AI FinTech Index
3801 N Capital of Texas Hwy, Ste E240 · Austin, TX 78746