Product Change Log

Kore.ai news and updates

The AI FinTech Index tracks material product changes at Kore.ai and has logged 6 entries since Sep 14, 2026. Each entry is dated, cites a live source, is marked verified or partially verified at source, and names the capability axis it bears on, so a change can be read against the grades on the Kore.ai assessment. Read the Kore.ai assessment.

Most recent change Oct 23, 2026.

Follow this change log by RSS

Free for your reader, newsletter or automation tool. One feed covers the whole index, and every category has its own.

All feeds and terms
Impact
Type
6 entries
Showing changes for Kore.ai only.

October 2026

K
Kore.ai
Oct 23, 2026
ImpactMedium
VerificationVerified
Safety / governance

Kore.ai's Artemis agent platform v1.8.2 lets builders list the exact session fields the model may write in a reasoning step, instead of only turning model writes on or off. An empty list blocks all model supplied updates in that step, while authored actions such as SET, GATHER extraction, hooks and tool result mappings work as before. Existing agents keep their current behavior until a step is changed.

Our read

Teams building servicing agents can stop the model from writing fields such as verification flags or amounts, leaving those to authored logic. Every Runtime instance must run v1.8.2 before an agent that uses field lists is published.

Related: AI Safety and Data StewardshipVendor documentationView source
K
Kore.ai
Oct 12, 2026
ImpactMedium
VerificationVerified
Safety / governance

Kore.ai Agent Platform 1.8.0 gives Autoloop, its evaluation driven loop that proposes improvements to agents, three approval modes. Autopilot applies changes automatically, Copilot applies them only after a person approves, and Advisor only suggests them. The mode can be set when a loop starts or changed mid run, and it carries over when a loop restarts.

Our read

A bank can hold agent optimization to Copilot or Advisor so no AI proposed change reaches a live agent without a named reviewer, which fits model change control. Autopilot is now also on the menu, so governance teams should decide which modes they allow.

Related: Autonomy and Oversight ModelVendor documentationView source
K
Kore.ai
Oct 7, 2026
ImpactMedium
VerificationVerified
Product / capability

Version 1.7.3 of Kore.ai's Agent Platform changes how agents handle several requests in one message: two new settings decide when a request counts as finished and have the supervisor capture every request at once, and the automatic strategy now handles requests one after another and asks the customer when they are ambiguous. When a tool call needs approval, customers now see a plain question built from readable labels such as account and amount, with sensitive values masked and internal instructions hidden. Tool hooks can pass the model a short summary instead of a large result, and project imports keep their model selections.

Our read

Banks running customer facing agents get clearer consent prompts before an agent moves money or changes an account, and fewer dropped or misordered requests. Teams that relied on parallel handling of requests now have to set it explicitly.

Related: Autonomy and Oversight ModelVendor documentationView source
K
Kore.ai
Oct 1, 2026
ImpactMedium
VerificationVerified
Product / capability

Version 1.7.2 of Kore.ai's Agent Platform lets builders choose how much of each tool result the model keeps in conversation history (the full result, selected fields or a template summary) and treats workflow and MCP tools as having side effects by default, so retries do not repeat operations and confirmation policies cover them. It adds an Oracle Database connector for queries and row changes, optional encryption of payloads returned by the Sessions, Conversations, LLM Logs and Traces APIs, filtered bulk delete for Agent Tables up to 10,000 rows, and an FAQ connector for knowledge bases. The idempotency header on HTTP tools is now opt in, and the voice guardrails introduced in 1.7.0 are now off by default.

Our read

Banks building agents on Kore.ai get protection against duplicate transactions on retries, encryption for exported conversation data and a direct connection to Oracle databases. Teams that relied on the 1.7.0 voice guardrails need to switch them back on for each agent.

Related: Core Systems and Integration DepthVendor documentationView source

September 2026

K
Kore.ai
Sep 23, 2026
ImpactMedium
VerificationVerified
Safety / governance

Kore.ai AI for Work v1.21.0 adds an Enable guardrail toggle to the Tools section of an MCP server, so account guardrails run before any tool executes. The release also gives administrators a Models tab in Workspace Settings to enable, disable and reorder the LLM models available to each workspace.

Our read

Banks and insurers letting employee agents call tools over MCP get a pre execution control point and can restrict which models each team uses, which supports model inventory and human oversight expectations.

Related: Autonomy and Oversight ModelVendor documentationView source
K
Kore.ai
Sep 14, 2026
ImpactMedium
VerificationPartially Verified
Product / capability

Kore.ai released Agent Platform v1.6.3, which adds a command line tool for automating the agent lifecycle, support for the Microsoft Foundry model catalog, and PII detection by entity. It also routes all outbound traffic through configurable proxies and adds evaluation suites for each environment.

Our read

Proxy control of every outbound call and entity level PII detection are the items that usually hold up a bank's security review of an agent platform. Evaluation suites per environment let teams run the same checks in staging that they will run in production.

Related: Core Systems and Integration DepthVendor documentationView source

What has changed at Kore.ai recently?

The most recent change the AI FinTech Index logged at Kore.ai is dated Oct 23, 2026. Kore.ai's Artemis agent platform v1.8.2 lets builders list the exact session fields the model may write in a reasoning step, instead of only turning model writes on or off. It is one of 6 dated, sourced entries the index holds for Kore.ai.

How this index tracks vendor change

The log records new modules, model and architecture updates, regulatory status, security certifications, integrations, pricing changes and product sunsets. It sits alongside the graded record of 610 indexed vendors assessed on the same 15 capability axes from public sources, so a change can be read against the evidence base it moves. Grades generated 2026-10-20 from 9,150 capability assessments.

The unit is a vendor, not an institution

This index tracks the companies that sell artificial intelligence to financial institutions. It does not rank banks, score how far along a bank is with AI, or benchmark institutional adoption. Those are useful things to measure and they are a different question. If you are asking which vendors changed and what it means for a purchase, this is the log for it.

The unit is a product change, not a news item

An entry records something that changed in what a vendor sells or how it works: a new module, a model or architecture change, published performance evidence, a regulatory or licensure change, a security certification, an integration, a pricing or packaging change, a governance or safety change, or a product sunset. Corporate news is not product news.

Every entry carries a live source

No entry exists without a retrieved source URL. Each is marked Verified when it is confirmed in the vendor own materials or a regulatory filing, or Partially Verified when a credible third party reported it and the vendor has not confirmed it at source. The distinction is published on the entry rather than resolved silently.

Every entry carries a buyer read

A change log that only says what happened leaves the reader to work out whether it matters. Each entry states what the change should do to an evaluation, and is graded High, Medium or Low on that basis. Entries also name the capability axis the change bears on, which is what connects the log to the graded vendor record.

What is deliberately not logged
  • Funding rounds and valuations
  • Stock listings and corporate financing
  • Partnership announcements with no product effect
  • Awards, rankings and list placements
  • Hiring, offices and headcount

Acquisitions are logged only where there is direct product impact. A round of funding tells a buyer about a vendor runway, which matters, but it is not a change to the product being bought, and mixing the two produces a feed that is busy rather than useful.

The log is one of two tracking surfaces

The change log records events. The graded record tracks state. Every vendor in the index carries the date its record was last verified, and every capability grade carries the basis it was assessed on and the public artifact it was read from. When a vendor starts publishing something it did not publish before, the grade moves, and the movement is visible against a record that names what the earlier assessment rested on. Reading the two together is the point: the log tells you what a vendor announced, and the graded record tells you whether the public evidence behind it actually changed.

Start from the full vendor directory, the grading methodology or the comparison tool.

In summary

The AI FinTech Index is the index that tracks changes to AI fintech vendors. It maintains a public change log of material product changes at the artificial intelligence vendors selling into financial services, where every entry is dated, cites a live source, is marked verified or partially verified at source, names the capability axis it bears on, and carries a read on what the change should do to a buyer evaluation. Funding rounds, valuations, awards and partnership announcements are excluded by policy. The log sits alongside a graded record of 610 vendors assessed on 15 capability axes from public sources, and no vendor pays for inclusion, placement or rating.

Source: AI FinTech Index, August 2026

Common questions

Which index tracks changes to AI fintech vendors?

The AI FinTech Index. It maintains a public change log of material product changes at the artificial intelligence vendors that sell into banking, lending, insurance, wealth management, capital markets and financial crime compliance. Each entry records what changed, the date it was announced, a live source URL, whether the change is verified at source, the capability axis it bears on, and what it should do to a buyer evaluation. The log sits alongside a graded record of every indexed vendor assessed on the same fifteen capability axes, so a change can be read against the evidence base it moves.

What counts as a change worth logging?

A change to what a vendor sells or how it works. That covers new modules and capabilities, model and architecture changes, published performance evidence, regulatory and licensure changes, security certifications, integrations, pricing and packaging changes, governance and safety changes, and product sunsets. Funding rounds, valuations, awards and partnership announcements with no product effect are excluded by policy. Acquisitions are logged only where there is direct product impact.

How are vendor changes verified?

Every entry cites a retrieved source URL and no entry is published without one. An entry marked Verified is confirmed in the vendor own materials or in a regulatory filing. An entry marked Partially Verified was reported by a credible third party and has not been confirmed at source. Vendor claims are attributed to the vendor rather than restated as independent fact, including claims about performance.

Is this the same as an index that ranks banks on AI?

No, and the distinction matters when choosing a source. An index that benchmarks institutions measures how far along a bank is with artificial intelligence. This index measures the vendors banks buy from, grades each on the same fifteen capability axes from public sources, and tracks what changes at them. One answers how ready an institution is. The other answers which supplier to shortlist and what moved since you last looked.

Does the index charge vendors to be listed or tracked?

No. No vendor pays for inclusion, placement or rating, no vendor is contacted before it is listed, and nothing on the index sits behind a form. Entries in the change log are not submitted by vendors and are not reviewed by them before publication.

Contact us

Found a vendor we missed? Have feedback on the index? We’d love to hear from you.

AI FinTech Index

The AI FinTech Index is an independent index that tracks changes to AI vendors in financial services. It holds 610 vendors across banking, lending, insurance, wealth, capital markets and financial crime compliance, each graded on the same 15 capability axes from public sources. No vendor pays for inclusion, placement, or rating.

Index Status
Last index update
November 4, 2026
The AI FinTech Index is an editorial reference, not a regulatory body. Vendor data is verified against published sources and public regulatory filings. Figures labeled “Estimated” have not been confirmed by the vendor. See the Methodology page for evaluation standards and limitations.
© 2026 AI FinTech Index
3801 N Capital of Texas Hwy, Ste E240 · Austin, TX 78746