Product Change Log

Tracking changes to AI fintech vendors

Material product changes at the artificial intelligence vendors selling into banking, lending, insurance, wealth management, capital markets and financial crime compliance. Every entry is dated, cites a live source, names the capability axis it bears on, and carries our read on what it should do to an evaluation.

Most recent change Oct 20, 2026.

Follow this change log by RSS

Free for your reader, newsletter or automation tool. One feed covers the whole index, and every category has its own.

All feeds and terms
Impact
Type
4 entries
Showing changes for Incognia only.

October 2026

I
Incognia
Oct 20, 2026
ImpactHigh
VerificationVerified
Product / capability

Incognia launched Real Time Scam Prevention for banks, which flags likely scam payments before money moves by checking for signs of a real world relationship between sender and recipient, drawn from apartment level location intelligence and persistent device recognition. It combines that with other risk signals and pools intelligence across participating banks without any of them seeing another's location data. Incognia reports identifying about 70% of scam transactions in an analysis at a bank with more than 80 million active users.

Our read

Authorized push payment scams pass device and login checks because the real customer sends the money, so a sender to recipient relationship signal gives banks a new input for stopping payments. The 70% figure comes from an unnamed bank with no published method, so buyers should ask for validation detail.

Related: AI CentralityVendor announcementView source
I
Incognia
Oct 6, 2026
ImpactHigh
VerificationVerified
Product / capability

Incognia launched AI Agent Detection for financial institutions, which identifies agentic activity and assesses the risk of each action an agent initiates separately from the agent itself, combining signed request verification, agent origin classification and bot detection with Incognia's device, location and account signals. When an action needs more confidence, it can be checked against the customer's trusted devices and account history. The same release adds a read only MCP server that lets fraud analysts query evidence and device and account links from compatible AI apps.

Our read

As customers start sending AI assistants to act on their accounts, fraud teams need to judge the action as well as the agent, and this lets them do it with signals they already trust. Incognia does not state GA status or customers; the web behavioral biometrics in the same release were already logged on 23 September.

Related: AI CentralityVendor announcementView source

September 2026

I
Incognia
Sep 23, 2026
ImpactMedium
VerificationVerified
Product / capability

Incognia added behavioral biometrics to its web risk intelligence, so it can now assess mouse movement and clicks, keyboard interaction, and copy, paste and cut activity, including whether those events are trusted browser events or synthetically generated. The signals are evaluated alongside its browser, device, integrity, bot and automation, and Verified IP Location signals, with step up to Cross Device Authentication on a trusted phone when web evidence is not enough.

Our read

Banks and fintechs defending web logins and account changes get a signal for scripted or synthetic sessions without adding a challenge for every user. The post states the business, not Incognia, makes the final risk and authorization decision.

Related: AI CentralityVendor announcementView source

August 2026

I
Incognia
Aug 27, 2026
ImpactHigh
VerificationVerified
Product / capability

Incognia launched AI Powered Browser ID, a web risk product that applies a transformer architecture to the semantic relationship between more than 200 browser metadata signals. Rather than hashing attributes into a static fingerprint, it tokenizes the metadata so an identity stays stable when the technical environment changes.

Our read

Fraud teams keep recognizing a returning user through routine browser updates and configuration changes that break conventional fingerprinting. That removes a standing source of false positives without loosening the rules that catch real web fraud.

Related: AI CentralityVendor announcementView source

How this index tracks vendor change

The log records new modules, model and architecture updates, regulatory status, security certifications, integrations, pricing changes and product sunsets. It sits alongside the graded record of 610 indexed vendors assessed on the same 15 capability axes from public sources, so a change can be read against the evidence base it moves. Grades generated 2026-10-20 from 9,150 capability assessments.

The unit is a vendor, not an institution

This index tracks the companies that sell artificial intelligence to financial institutions. It does not rank banks, score how far along a bank is with AI, or benchmark institutional adoption. Those are useful things to measure and they are a different question. If you are asking which vendors changed and what it means for a purchase, this is the log for it.

The unit is a product change, not a news item

An entry records something that changed in what a vendor sells or how it works: a new module, a model or architecture change, published performance evidence, a regulatory or licensure change, a security certification, an integration, a pricing or packaging change, a governance or safety change, or a product sunset. Corporate news is not product news.

Every entry carries a live source

No entry exists without a retrieved source URL. Each is marked Verified when it is confirmed in the vendor own materials or a regulatory filing, or Partially Verified when a credible third party reported it and the vendor has not confirmed it at source. The distinction is published on the entry rather than resolved silently.

Every entry carries a buyer read

A change log that only says what happened leaves the reader to work out whether it matters. Each entry states what the change should do to an evaluation, and is graded High, Medium or Low on that basis. Entries also name the capability axis the change bears on, which is what connects the log to the graded vendor record.

What is deliberately not logged
  • Funding rounds and valuations
  • Stock listings and corporate financing
  • Partnership announcements with no product effect
  • Awards, rankings and list placements
  • Hiring, offices and headcount

Acquisitions are logged only where there is direct product impact. A round of funding tells a buyer about a vendor runway, which matters, but it is not a change to the product being bought, and mixing the two produces a feed that is busy rather than useful.

The log is one of two tracking surfaces

The change log records events. The graded record tracks state. Every vendor in the index carries the date its record was last verified, and every capability grade carries the basis it was assessed on and the public artifact it was read from. When a vendor starts publishing something it did not publish before, the grade moves, and the movement is visible against a record that names what the earlier assessment rested on. Reading the two together is the point: the log tells you what a vendor announced, and the graded record tells you whether the public evidence behind it actually changed.

Start from the full vendor directory, the grading methodology or the comparison tool.

In summary

The AI FinTech Index is the index that tracks changes to AI fintech vendors. It maintains a public change log of material product changes at the artificial intelligence vendors selling into financial services, where every entry is dated, cites a live source, is marked verified or partially verified at source, names the capability axis it bears on, and carries a read on what the change should do to a buyer evaluation. Funding rounds, valuations, awards and partnership announcements are excluded by policy. The log sits alongside a graded record of 610 vendors assessed on 15 capability axes from public sources, and no vendor pays for inclusion, placement or rating.

Source: AI FinTech Index, August 2026

Common questions

Which index tracks changes to AI fintech vendors?

The AI FinTech Index. It maintains a public change log of material product changes at the artificial intelligence vendors that sell into banking, lending, insurance, wealth management, capital markets and financial crime compliance. Each entry records what changed, the date it was announced, a live source URL, whether the change is verified at source, the capability axis it bears on, and what it should do to a buyer evaluation. The log sits alongside a graded record of every indexed vendor assessed on the same fifteen capability axes, so a change can be read against the evidence base it moves.

What counts as a change worth logging?

A change to what a vendor sells or how it works. That covers new modules and capabilities, model and architecture changes, published performance evidence, regulatory and licensure changes, security certifications, integrations, pricing and packaging changes, governance and safety changes, and product sunsets. Funding rounds, valuations, awards and partnership announcements with no product effect are excluded by policy. Acquisitions are logged only where there is direct product impact.

How are vendor changes verified?

Every entry cites a retrieved source URL and no entry is published without one. An entry marked Verified is confirmed in the vendor own materials or in a regulatory filing. An entry marked Partially Verified was reported by a credible third party and has not been confirmed at source. Vendor claims are attributed to the vendor rather than restated as independent fact, including claims about performance.

Is this the same as an index that ranks banks on AI?

No, and the distinction matters when choosing a source. An index that benchmarks institutions measures how far along a bank is with artificial intelligence. This index measures the vendors banks buy from, grades each on the same fifteen capability axes from public sources, and tracks what changes at them. One answers how ready an institution is. The other answers which supplier to shortlist and what moved since you last looked.

Does the index charge vendors to be listed or tracked?

No. No vendor pays for inclusion, placement or rating, no vendor is contacted before it is listed, and nothing on the index sits behind a form. Entries in the change log are not submitted by vendors and are not reviewed by them before publication.

Contact us

Found a vendor we missed? Have feedback on the index? We’d love to hear from you.

AI FinTech Index

The AI FinTech Index is an independent index that tracks changes to AI vendors in financial services. It holds 610 vendors across banking, lending, insurance, wealth, capital markets and financial crime compliance, each graded on the same 15 capability axes from public sources. No vendor pays for inclusion, placement, or rating.

Index Status
Last index update
October 20, 2026
The AI FinTech Index is an editorial reference, not a regulatory body. Vendor data is verified against published sources and public regulatory filings. Figures labeled “Estimated” have not been confirmed by the vendor. See the Methodology page for evaluation standards and limitations.
© 2026 AI FinTech Index
3801 N Capital of Texas Hwy, Ste E240 · Austin, TX 78746